Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Joginder Singh vs State Of H.P. & Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 15362 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15362 HP
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Joginder Singh vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 21 October, 2024

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

Decided on : 21.10.2024

Joginder Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & ors. ....Respondents

Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1No

For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Mr. Govind Korla, Addl. A.Gs., Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Mr. Arsh Rattan and Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Dy.A.Gs., for the respondent-State. ____________________________________________________________________ Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (oral)

The instant petition has been filed for grant of following

substantive relief:

"that the respondents may be ordered to take action against respondent No.6 Sh. Subhash in accordance with law, as per the resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat Shilanji as well as in view of the communication dated 7.3.2024, Annexure P-3, by the District Panchayat Officer and fresh report may be ordered to be furnished as per the communication dated 7.3.2024 to the District Panchayat Officer by the concerned Block Development Officer and the process of removal may be initiated immediately.

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2 It is not in dispute that pursuant to notice issued by this Court

the official respondents have already taken an appropriate action in the

matter by issuing show cause notice to respondent No.6 under the

provisions of Section 145 of the H.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

3 Once that be so, the instant petition seeking direction to the

official respondents to initiate inquiry against respondent No.6 in

accordance with law has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as

such.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

KHEM COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=b3bb0330a36091c417dc6aa4221 2c14caec7825ba4158459325bd600d273

RAJ f58b, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=6aa9db3b3e85e6083 87fb6f0fa0bb2ddacd2e1b82f232ca3c0ad

THAKUR ea331da33983, CN=KHEM RAJ THAKUR Reason: I am approving this document Location:

(Satyen Vaidya) Date: 2024-10-22 10:51:34

21.10.2024 Judge (pankaj)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter