Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sher Singh & Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 17883 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17883 HP
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Sher Singh & Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others on 21 November, 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 987 of 2024.

Date of Decision: 21th November, 2024. Sher Singh & another .....Petitioners Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh & others .....Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1

For the Petitioners: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2/State.

                                           Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate,                   for
                                           respondents No. 3 & 4.


                 Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral).

By way of instant petition filed under Section 528 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for quashing

of FIR No. 108 of 2017 dated 14.03.2017, under Sections

451, 323, 506, 504 read with Section 34 of IPC, as well as

consequential proceedings pending before learned JMFC

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. Initially the said FIR

was registered under Section 451 of IPC and on filing of

challan Section 451 of IPC was converted into Section 452

of IPC

2. The averments contained in the petition, which is

duly supported by an affidavit reveals that on 14.03.2017

complainant/respondent No.3 had got a FIR registered

against the present petitioners under Sections 451, 323,

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

506, 504 read with Section 34 of IPC. Initially the said FIR

was registered under Section 451 of IPC and on filing of

challan Section 451 of IPC was converted into Section 452

of IPC. However, during the pendency of proceedings the

dispute inter se parties has been settled amicably vide

compromise deed Ext. P-1 dated 24.09.2024, copy whereof

is appended along with the present petition.

3. Statement of complainant/respondent No.3 stands

recorded. She has categorically stated that she has entered

into compromise of her own free will, volition and without

any pressure. According to the complainant/respondent

No.3, the dispute inter se parties stands amicably settled

between the parties.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record carefully.

5. This Court sees no impediment in quashing the FIR

in issue, as the dispute inter se the parties stands amicably

resolved.

6. From a perusal of Section 359 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, it is evident that in so far

as Section 452 IPC, is concerned, the same is not

compoundable.

7. In this respect, attention of this Court has been

drawn to a case titled Narinder Singh and others vs.

State of Punjab and another reported as (2014) 6

Supreme Court Cases, 466, wherein the Apex Court has

categorically laid down that the High Court has inherent

power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those

cases, which are not compoundable, where the parties

have amicably settled the matter inter se them. However,

this power is to be exercised sparingly and with caution, in

cases where settlement is arrived at. The guiding factors

being securing the ends of justice or to prevent an abuse of

the process of any Court.

8. Further, the Apex Court in Parbatbhai Aahir alias

Parbathbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur and others vs.

State of Gujarat and another, (2017) 9 SCC 641

summarizing the broad principles regarding inherent

powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has

recognized that these powers are not inhibited by

provisions of Section 320 Cr.P.C.

9. In view of the fact that the parties have entered into

compromise permitting the proceedings in pursuance to

the aforesaid FIR sought to be quashed to continue would

only result into an abuse of process and the same would

not secure the ends of justice.

10. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 108 of

2017 dated 14.03.2017, under Sections 452, 323, 506, 504

read with Section 34 of IPC, as well as consequential

proceedings pending before learned JMFC Paonta Sahib,

District Sirmaur, H.P. are quashed.

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms,

so also the pending application(s), if any.

(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge

21st November, 2024 (Nisha)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter