Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Decided On: 11.11.2024 vs M/S Vidhimata Wood (Private) Limited
2024 Latest Caselaw 16807 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16807 HP
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Decided On: 11.11.2024 vs M/S Vidhimata Wood (Private) Limited on 11 November, 2024

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

                                                             2024:HHC:11127


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                       Review Petition No.110 of 2024
                       Decided on: 11.11.2024

       State of H.P. & others                                  ...Petitioners

                                    Versus

       M/s Vidhimata Wood (Private) Limited                  ...Respondent
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners:            Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with
                                Mr.Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Pranay Pratap
                                Singh, Mr. Gobind Koral, Additional
                                Advocates General, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan
                                and Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocates
                                General.

For the respondent:             Ms. Devyani Sharma Senior Advocate with
                                Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)

Heard.

2. By way of instant petition, the petitioners have sought

review of order dated 14th August, 2024, passed by this Court in

LPA No.180 of 2024.

3. The order sought to be reviewed reads as under:

"Since, the costs directed to be paid under the orders passed by this Court on 3rd July, 2024 have not been paid to the respondent by the appellants, in view of the default clause contained in the said order dt. 3 rd July, 2024, the appeal stands dismissed."

4. LPA No.180 of 2024 was filed by the petitioners

herein to assail judgment dated 2nd November, 2023, passed in

CWP No.1714 of 2023, titled as M/s Vidhimata Wood (Private)

Limited vs. State of H.P. & others with application CMP(M)

No.567 of 2024 for condoning the delay of 139 days in filing the

appeal.

5. CMP(M) No.567 of 2024 was allowed by this Court

vide order dated 3rd July, 2024, subject to payment of costs of

Rs.5,000/- to the respondent within two weeks from the date of

passing of the order. In default of payment of costs, the application

was ordered to be dismissed.

6. The time granted to deposit the costs expired on

17.07.2024.

7. On 14.08.2024, when LPA No.180 of 2024 was listed

before this Court, the same was ordered to be dismissed on account

of default committed by the petitioners in complying with order

dated 3rd July, 2024 as the petitioners were found to have not

deposited the costs.

8. According to the petitioners, after passing of order

dated 3rd July, 2024, they had established contact with the

Managing Director of the respondent and also with his counsel so

as to ascertain the details of bank account to enable the petitioners

to deposit the costs, but they had not received any response. It is

further submitted by the petitioners that on 11.07.2024, a demand

draft in the sum of Rs.5,000/- was prepared payable to the

respondents, but since the respondent had not supplied them the

particulars, the costs remained unpaid.

9. The order dated 14th August, 2024, passed in LPA

No.180 of 2024 does not reveal that the facts, as narrated in the

instant petition, were disclosed to the Court. Even otherwise, the

fact remains that the costs had not been paid by the petitioners to

the respondent in terms of order dated 3 rd July, 2024. There is no

explanation as to why the particulars of the bank details were

required by the petitioners, when they had prepared the demand

draft on 11.07.2024. It is not the case of the petitioners that they

had dispatched the demand draft to the respondent immediately

after its preparation or at least within the time of two weeks granted

to them for compliance of the order dated 3rd July, 2024. The

petitioners were well aware about the address of the respondent and

they could have easily dispatched the demand draft to the

respondent within the prescribed period of time.

10. In the aforesaid backdrop of facts, no error apparent

on the face of order dated 14th August, 2024, passed by this Court

in LPA No.180 of 2024 is made out. Even the bonafides of the

petitioners with respect to the assertions made in the petition are

not established.

11. In result,the petition fails and the same is dismissed

alongwith pending application(s), if any.

( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice

( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge November 11, 2024 (vt)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter