Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Decided On 11Th November 2024 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another
2024 Latest Caselaw 16805 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16805 HP
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Decided On 11Th November 2024 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 11 November, 2024

Author: Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel

2024:HHC:11113


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
                                  CWP No. 7373 of 2023
                                  Decided on 11th November 2024
Jai Parkash
                                                       ...Petitioner
                           Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another
                                                   ...Respondents
Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
1
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner:      Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate.

For the respondents:    Mr.  Pushpinder        Jaswal,     Additional
                        Advocate General.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has

challenged the transfer order dated 30.09.2023 (Annexure P-1), in

terms whereof, the petitioner was transferred from Darlaghat to

Mandi after a short stay of 4 months.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he was serving as an

Assistant Professor at Chaura Maidan Shimla, when he was

transferred to Darlaghat in the month of March, 2023. He joined at

Darlaghat and after a short stay of about 6 months, he was

transferred vide impugned notification dated 30.09.2023 to Mandi

without allowing him to complete his normal tenure at Darlaghat.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer of the

2024:HHC:11113

petitioner without allowing the petitioner to complete his normal

tenure was allegedly on the basis of order dated 25.09.2023, passed

by this Court in CWP No.4501 of 2023. He further submits that the

there was no direction of any kind passed by this Court in its order

dated 25.09.2023, which could have resulted in the transfer of the

petitioner from Darlaghat to Mandi. He further submits that therein

the issue involved in CWP No.4501 of 2023 which was relating to

the withdrawal of NCC activity in the Vallabh Government College

Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., relating to NCC cadets. The writ petition

was ultimately decided by the Court on 31.10.2023 by quashing the

order so passed by the Commanding Officer with a direction to the

respondents to continue the NCC activities in Vallabh Government

College, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., and, therefore also, the

impugned transfer order, which was passed by the Authority in the

garb of the order so passed by this Court in CWP No.4501 of 2023

is not sustainable, as the petitioner was transferred without allowing

him to complete his normal tenure at Darlaghat. Accordingly, learned

counsel has prayed that the petition be allowed and the transfer

order be quashed and set aside.

3. Learned Additional Advocate General has drawn the

attention of the Court to the reply filed by the State and has

submitted that besides the fact that the petitioner was transferred to

2024:HHC:11113

Mandi to restore the NCC activities in the College concerned, the

petitioner being a State Cadre employee and a Class-I cannot insist

upon him being stationed a particular station only. He has further

submitted that as the petitioner has been transferred in

administrative exigency, therefore, the petition being devoid of any

merit is liable to be dismissed.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have

also carefully gone through the pleadings as well as documents on

record.

5. A perusal of the impugned notification demonstrates

that the petitioner was transferred from Darlaghat to Vallabh

Government College Mandi by referring to order dated 25.09.2023

passed by this Court in CWP No.4501 of 2023, titled as

Parents Teacher Association-Vallabh Government College, Mandi

versus Union of India and others. This order, which has been made

available for the perusal of this Court, reads as under:-

"The Court had discussion with the Officiating Group Commander as well as the Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

A joint request has been made by the respondents that hearing of the case be deferred by about two weeks, so that in the interregnum the parties can discuss the matter and resolve the issue. Ordered accordingly.

As prayed for, list on 04.10.2023. Respondents need not to remain present on the next date of hearing."

2024:HHC:11113

6. In fact, the order that was passed by this Court on

25.09.2023, nowhere contained any whisper or observation with

regard to the transfer of some incumbent to Vallabh Government

College, Mandi, H.P., so as to entail the transfer of the petitioner on

that count. Another fact, which is relevant to be mentioned that this

stage is that there is no dispute at least qua this fact that the

petitioner had joined at Darlaghat only in the month of March, 2023.

The judgment, which was ultimately passed in CWP No.4501

of 2023 (supra) on 31.10.2023, was also limited to the quashing of

the order that was passed by the Commanding Officer relating to

Vallabh Government College, Mandi, H.P. Now, in view of the fact

that the petitioner at no time was posted at Government Vallabh

College, Mandi, H.P., it is not understood as to how the pendency of

this said writ was attracted by the respondents to transfer the

petitioner from Darlaghat to Mandi. The transfer order, thus, of the

petitioner indeed is arbitrary and not sustainable in the eyes of law.

In fact, the operation of the transfer order was stayed by this Court

on 06.10.2023 and practically the petitioner is continuing at

Darlaghat only and he has never joined at Vallabh Government

College Mandi. Therefore, as this Court does not finds any cogent

reason leading to the issuance of the transfer order, this writ petition

is allowed by setting aside the impugned notification dated

2024:HHC:11113

30.09.2023 with the direction the respondents to allow the petitioner

to complete reasonable tenure at Darlaghat keeping in view the fact

that he is a Class-I Officer.

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge

November 11, 2024 (Vinod)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter