Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pushpa Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 11375 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11375 HP
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Pushpa Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 8 August, 2024

                                            1




    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                            CWP No.8012 of 2024




                                                                         .
                                            Date of Decision : 08.08.2024





Pushpa Devi                                                         ...... Petitioner





                               Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh and others                                ......Respondents





Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge

Whether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioner        :    Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate.

For the respondents :          Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General.



Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)

Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate General,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the

following relief:-

"a) That the impugned portion of the notification dated 21-

02-2018 contained as Annexure P-1/Annexure P-1/T qua to the cut of date i.e. 10-05-2001 may kindly be deleted.

b) That the respondents may kindly be directed to reinstate the services of the petitioner as she was retired on 30th June, 2023 and permit her in service till

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

the age of 60 years alongwith all consequential benefits as admissible to her."

.

3. The State vide Notification dated 21.02.2018 had

made a distinction between Class-IV employees engaged prior to

10.05.2001 and those engaged after 10.05.2001 for the purpose of

determining the age of their retirement. Those Class IV employees

engaged prior to 10.05.2001 were retired after attaining the age of 60

years and those Class IV employees engaged after 10.05.2001 were

retired after attaining the age of 58 years. The aforesaid notification come

up for consideration before this Court in CWP No. 2274 of 2021 alongwith

connected matters, titled Satya Devi vs. State of H.P. & others

alongwith connected matters, decided on 28.05.2024. Therein the

Notification dated 21.02.2018 was quashed. It was further ordered that all

Class-IV employees (government servants) irrespective of their dates of

appointment would now retire after attaining the age of 60 years. The

relevant extract of the aforesaid judgment is being reproduced here-in-

below:

"118 Therefore, for all the aforesaid reasons we strike down the words "appointed on part time/daily wage basis prior to 10.5.2001 and regularized on or after 10.5.2001" in the notification dated 21.02.2018 and declare that all class-IV Government servants irrespective of their initial date of engagement or the date of their regularization would retire on the last day of the month in which they attain the age of their superannuation of 60 years.

119. All the Writ Petitions are allowed to the extent indicated above. Such of the petitioners/ Class IV Government

servants who had retired from service prior to attaining age of superannuation of 60 years, shall be reinstated by the

.

respondents if they have not crossed High Court of H.P.3 the

age of 60 years as on date. Others who will not be able to be reinstated now on ground that they have already attained the

age of 60 years, shall be paid compensation equal to the total emoluments which they would have received had they been in service until they attained the age of 60 years, less any amount they might have received by way of pension.,

etc. They will also be entitled to consequential retiral benefits. These shall be paid within 3 months from today. Those who are continuing in service by virtue of interim orders passed by

this Court shall continue in service till they attain the age of

60 years. No costs".

4. It is stated by the learned counsel on both sides that the

issue involved in this petition is covered by the judgment delivered on

28.05.2024 in CWP No. 2274 of 2021 (Satya Devi vs. State of H.P and

others) and batch of cases.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the

aforesaid judgment and the respondents are directed to continue the

petitioner in service till she attains the age of 60 years.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand

disposed of.




                                                      ( Bipin Chander Negi)
          th
August 8 , 2024 (KS)                                            Judge





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter