Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14339 HP
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
.
Civil Writ Petition No. 6753 of 2023
Date of Decision: 21.9.2023
_____________________________________________________________________
Sh. Kamal Kishor and Ors.
.........Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
.......Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Aman Hansretta, Proxy Counsel.
For the respondents: Mr. Yash Pal Dholta, Mr. Rupinder Singh
Thakur, Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional
Advocates General and Mr. Sumeet Sharma &
Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocates General
with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that his clients
would be content and satisfied in case prayer made in the instant
petition is considered and decided by the competent authority in terms
of judgment dated 31.8.2022, passed by the Division Bench of this
Court in CWP No. 342 of 2021, Yashwant Singh and Ors v. State of
Himachal Pradesh and Anr., alongwith connected matters (Annexure
P-2). Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to the
aforesaid innocuous prayer made by the petitioners.
2. Having perused aforesaid judgment sought to be relied
.
upon vis-à-vis issue raised in the petition at hand, this Court finds
that issue raised in the instant petition already stands adjudicated in
the aforesaid judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court
and as such, no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in
case respondents are directed to consider and decide case of the
petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is
disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide
case of the petitioners in light of Yashwant Singh's case (supra),
expeditiously, preferably, within four weeks. In case, petitioners are
found to be similarly situate to the respondents in the aforesaid
judgment, they would be extended similar benefits. Needless to say,
authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of the instant
order shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass
detailed speaking order thereupon. However, liberty is granted to the
petitioners to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate court of
law, if they still remain aggrieved. All pending applications stand
disposed of.
September 21, 2023 (Sandeep Sharma),
manjit Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!