Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13616 HP
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos.4453 & 5791 of 2023 Decided on: 14th September, 2023 _________________________________________________________________
.
1. CWP No. 4453 of 2023
Ranjeet Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
2. CWP No. 5791 of 2023
Jagdish Chand ....Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, 1 Whether approved for reporting?
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner(s): Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur,
& Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocates General, Ms.Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocates General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
behalf of the respondents.
2. Heard.
3. Both the petitions have been filed by the
.
petitioners for the grant of following common relief:-
"(A) That a writ in the nature of mandamus and any
other writ, order or direction may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to extend the benefit of minimum of the pay scale to the petitioner, which was revised on 01.01.2006 (Rs.10300-34800) with
appropriate Grade Pay of the post for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2010 alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the due date till actual payment r with all consequential benefits. "
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
the relief prayed for by the petitioners is covered by the
decision dated 29.06.2022, rendered in CWPOA No. 7661 of
2019 ( Pushap Raj Khimta & others Vs. State of H.P. &
Ors.). Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the
petitioners would be content if the cases of the petitioners are
considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid
judgment. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no
objection to this prayer.
5. Having regard to above submissions and without
examining the merits of the matter, both the petitions are
disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the
respective cases of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid
judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law
.
within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
this order. The decision so arrived at, shall also be
communicated to the petitioners.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also
to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
September 14, 2023 R.Atal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!