Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13357 HP
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4967/2023 Decided on: 12.09.2023
.
Harvinder Kaur ....Petitioner
Versus
SBI & Ors. ......Respondents
............................................................................................. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner
For the respondents r :
: toMr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Shivender Pal Sharma, Chief
Manager, SBI Admin. Office Kasumpti Shimla, present in person.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
The petitioner has assailed transfer order dated
31.05.2023 (Annexure P-2) as well as order dated 28.07.2023
(Annexure P-4) whereby her representation against this transfer order
was rejected.
2. In terms of order dated 31.05.2023 (Annexure P-2), the
petitioner was transferred to Local Head Office (LHO) Chandigarh. One
of the grounds taken by the petitioner for assailing her transfer to Local
Head Office Chandigarh was that her husband Sh. Mohit Kumar was
serving at Karloti Branch AO Shimla. Learned counsel for the petitioner
had also made a prayer for accommodating and adjusting the husband
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
at the place where the petitioner was transferred under the impugned
transfer i.e. Local Head Office Chandigarh.
.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has placed on
record the transfer order of Sh. Mohit Kumar statedly issued on
08.09.2023 and submitted that petitioner's husband i.e. Sh. Mohit
Kumar has been transferred by the respondent-bank from Karloti
Branch AO Shimla to Local Head Office & its Establishments. Learned
counsel on the basis of instructions imparted by officials of respondent-
bank further submitted that Sh. Mohit Kumar shall be relieved within a
week from today to enable him to join at Local Head Office Chandigarh
& its Establishments.
4. In view of transfer order of petitioner's husband dated
08.09.2023 and the submissions made by learned counsel for the
respondent-bank, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the matter is disposed of and closed at this stage. Pending
miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 12th September, 2023 (Rohit)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!