Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5478 HP
Judgement Date : 10 May, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1045 of 2023
Date of Decision: 10.05.2023
______________________________________________________________
.
Shri Sukh Ram ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh .....Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate.
For the respondent: M/s Jitender Sharma, Tejesvi Sharma,
Pushpender Jaswal and Baldev Negi,
Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr.
Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General.
_______________________________________________________________
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral):
Status report filed, which is perused and ordered to be taken
on record.
2. On instructions, learned Additional Advocate General
submits that though the petitioner has joined the investigation as and when
directed by the Investigating Officer, however, as per him, grant of bail is not
warranted in the facts of the case.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone
through the status report.
4. It is not in dispute that after the grant of bail, the petitioner
has duly participated in the course of investigation and has not created any
hindrance in the same. It is further not the allegation of the prosecution that in the
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
interregnum, post grant of interim bail, the petitioner has either tried to influence
any witness or has created any other impediment in the course of investigation.
5. In view of the above, this petition is allowed and order dated
.
28.04.2023, passed in case FIR No. 31 of 2023, dated 26.04.2023, registered
under Sections 18-61-85 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act at
Police Station Chopal, District Shimla, H.P. is made absolute, subject to the
following conditions:
"i) Petitioner shall furnish personal bond in
the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court within a period of two weeks from today.
(ii) He shall make himself available for the
purpose of interrogation, if so required and regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek
exemption from appearance by filing appropriate application;
iii) He shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence nor hamper the investigation of the case in any manner whatsoever.
iv) He shall not make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer; and
v) He shall not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Court."
6. It is clarified that findings which have been returned by this
Court while deciding this petition are only for the purpose of adjudication of the
present bail application and learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by any of
the findings so returned by this Court in the adjudication of this petition during the
trial of the case. It is further clarified that in case the petitioner does not comply
with the conditions which have been imposed upon him while granting the present
bail, the State shall be at liberty to approach this Court for the cancellation of the
.
bail. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
Downloaded copy of this judgment is valid for compliance.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
May 10, 2023
(bhupender)
r to
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!