Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5164 HP
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet No.200 of 2020
Decided on: 4th May, 2023
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amar Singh .....Petitioner
.
Versus
State of H.P and others .....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner r : Mr. Dalip Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents :Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta,
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Mr. Rupinder Singh, Additional Advocates General with Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate, General, for the
respondents.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
The petitioner seeks execution of judgment
dated 06.04.2015 passed in OA No. 366 of 2015. In the
aforesaid judgment, learned Erstwhile HP Administrative
Tribunal had directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioner in light of judgment dated 28.07.2010 passed in
CWP No. 2735 of 2010 (Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P.)
alongwith connected matters.
Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order?
2. During hearing of the case today, learned
Deputy Advocate General has placed on record a copy of
instructions memo dated 03.05.2023 addressed to Advocate
General by the Executive Engineer, Sundernagar Division,
.
HP. PWD, Sundernagar. These instructions state that the
claim of the petitioner was considered in terms of the
judgment dated 06.04.2015 passed in OA No. 366 of 2015,
but was rejected on 15.6.2015. However, learned Deputy
Advocate General further submitted that the case of the
petitioner is now being re-considered in light of subsequent
pronouncements in LPA No. 165 of 2021 titled State of H.P.
vs. Suraj Mani and others decided on 12.1.2023. Learned
Deputy Advocate General also states that the decision so
taken by the respondents, shall be communicated to the
petitioner.
3. In view of the above, present execution petition
is disposed at this stage as satisfied. As submitted by
learned Deputy Advocate General, the respondents may
take fresh decision and consider the case of the petitioner
in light of the judgment passed in Suraj Mani's case
(Supra), the subsequent decision rendered on the subject. It
shall be open for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy
in accordance with law, if need so arises. Pending
applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
.
May 4th, 2023 Judge
tarun
r to
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!