Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4977 HP
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023
.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.911 of 2023
Decided on: 01.05.2023
Dinesh Kumar ....Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent : M/s Baldev Negi, Pushpender Jaswal,
Additional Advocate Generals, with
Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate
General.
ASI Rajender Kumar, P.S. Bhoranj, District
Hamirpur, H.P., present in person.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Status report filed, which is perused and ordered to be
taken on record.
ASI Rajender Kumar, Police Station Bhoranj, District
Hamirpur, H.P., who is present in the Court, has submitted that the
petitioner has joined the investigation as directed by the Court and
though he is not cooperating in the course thereof, but he is not
cooperating in the investigation.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that taking
into consideration the fact that FIR No.53 of 2023 was registered
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
.
against the petitioner at Police Station Bhoranj, District Hamirpur,
H.P. and on the fateful day when the incident took place, the
petitioner was at Dhami in District Shimla, H.P. where he is serving
as a Patwari, otherwise also, the case registered against the
petitioner is a completely false case.
3.
Be that as it may, as the petitioner is stated to be
participating in the course of investigation, therefore, in the peculiar
facts of the case and taking into consideration the contention which
has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is
allowed of by confirming order dated 13.04.2022, passed in FIR
No.53 of 2023, dated 13.04.2023, registered under Section 302 read
with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Bhoranj,
District Hamirpur, H.P., subject to the following conditions:
i) Petitioner shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/ with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of learned Trial Court, within a period of two weeks from today.
ii) He shall make himself available for the purpose of interrogation, if so required and regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek exemption from appearance by filing appropriate application;
iii) He shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence nor hamper the investigation of the case in any manner whatsoever.
iv) He shall not make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer; and
.
v) He shall not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Court.
4. It is clarified that the findings which have been returned
by this Court while deciding this petition are only for the purpose of
adjudication of the present bail petition and learned trial Court shall
not be influenced by any of the findings so returned by this Court in
the adjudication of this petition during the trial of the case. It is
further clarified that in case the petitioner does not complies with
the conditions which have been imposed upon him while granting
the present bail, the respondentState shall be at liberty to approach
this Court for the cancellation of the bail. The petition stands
disposed of in the above terms.
Downloaded copy of this order is valid for compliance.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge May 01, 2023 (Rishi)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!