Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2154 HP
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2023
Managing Director v. Sarita
.
CMP Nos. 1754 & 1755 of 2023
in FAO No. 186 of 2014
13.3.2023 Present: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/respondents No. 2 and 3.
CMP No. 1754 of 2023 By way of instant application filed under Order 32
Rule 12 read with Section 151 CPC, prayer has been made by
the applicants/respondent No.2 and 3 i.e. Kumari Kritika @
Kriti and Kumari Himanshu, for discharge of their natural
guardian Ms. Sarita as they have attained majority. No reply is
intended to be filed by the non-applicants.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused averments contained in the application, which is duly
supported by the affidavits as well as documents annexed
therewith, this Court finds that interest of the
applicants/respondent No.2 and 3 i.e. Kumari Kritika @ Kriti
and Kumari Himanshu was earlier being protected by Ms.
Sarita. Since the applicants have attained majority, they are
entitled to prosecute the case in their independent capacity and
as such, prayer made on their behalf of discharge of natural
guardian, deserves to be allowed.
Consequently, in view of the above, the application
is allowed and applicants/respondent No.2 and 3 i.e. Kumari
Kritika @ Kriti and Kumari Himanshu are discharged from the
natural guardianship of Ms. Sarita, who are further allowed to
prosecute the case in their own independent capacity.
.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No. 1755 of 2023
By way of instant application filed under Section
151 CPC, prayer has been made on behalf of the
applicants/respondents No. 2 and 3 for release of the award
amount lying deposited in the Registry of this court. Learned
counsel representing r the non-applicants/appellants fairly
states that appeal bearing FAO No. 186 of 2014, having been
filed by the non-applicants/appellants stands finally decided
inter-se parties before the Lokadalat held on 6.12.2014 in this
Court. Since no appeal, whatsoever, has been filed against the
aforesaid judgment passed by this Court in the superior court
of law by either of the parties, same has attained finality.
Consequently, in view of the above, this court sees
no impediment in accepting the prayer having been made by
the applicants for release of award amount lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court and accordingly, the application is
allowed and Registry is directed to release the award amount in
favour of the applicants, by remitting the same in their saving
bank accounts strictly as per their shares, detail whereof is
mentioned in para-5 of the application, subject to verification
by the Accounts Branch. Application stands disposed of.
March 13, 2023 (Sandeep Sharma),
manjit Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!