Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9821 HP
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Arb. Case No. 124 of 2022 Decided on: 19th July, 2023
.
_________________________________________________________________
Achhari Devi ...Petitioner
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Competent Authority & Ors.
...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. Sanket Sankhyan Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Rupinder Singh Thakur and Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocates General with Ms. Seema Sharma and
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocates General for respondent No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
The petition has been filed under Section 29A (4)
& (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with a prayer
for extension of time in completing the arbitration proceedings
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
in Reference Petition No.146/2018, pending before the
Divisional Commissioner Mandi, Division Mandi.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
.
Reference Petition No.146/2018, titled Achhari Devi Versus
Land Acquisition Officer, Bilaspur, was instituted by the
petitioner before the Divisional Commissioner, Mandi, seeking
enhancement of compensation awarded by the Land
Acquisition Officer. The pleadings in the reference petition
before the Divisional Commissioner, i.e. the Arbitrator, were
completed on 22.08.2019. Accordingly, in terms of the
amendment carried out in Section 29A of the Arbitration &
Conciliation Act in the year 2019, the award could have been
passed by 22.08.2020. However, the matter could not be taken
up by the Arbitrator, i.e. the Divisional Commissioner, Mandi,
from March, 2020 onwards due to COVID-19 pandemic. It has
further been highlighted that the Hon'ble Apex Court, taking
cognizance of the lockdown situation due to COVID-19
pandemic, had passed an order on 23.03.2020 in Suo Moto
Writ Petition (Civil) No.03/2020, extending the period of
limitation under general as well as special laws. In the
aforesaid background, prayer has been made for extending the
period for completion of arbitral proceedings by 12 months in
the interest of justice and fair play.
3. Learned counsel on both the sides have jointly
.
submitted that similar petitions have been disposed of by the
Coordinate Benches of this Court by granting extension to the
learned Arbitrator by six months for deciding the arbitration
proceedings. Reference in this regard has been made to order
dated 13.01.2023 passed in Arbitration Case No.02 of 2023,
order dated 22.03.2023 Abr. Case No. 36 of 2023 alongwith
connected matters and order dated 03.05.2023 passed in Arb.
Case No. 86 of 2023 and the connected matters.
In view of above submissions and the orders
passed in similar matters, the present petition is also disposed
of on the similar lines. Hence, time for completion of
arbitration proceedings by the Divisional Commissioner
Mandi, Division Mandi-Sole Arbitrator in case under reference
is extended by six months, to be reckoned from today. The
parties through their learned counsel are directed to appear
before the learned Arbitrator on 29.08.2023.
The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,
also stand disposed of.
.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
July 19, 2023
R.Atal
r to
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!