Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12366 HP
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Criminal Revision No.438 of 2023
.
Decided on : 25.08.2023
Basant Kumar ...Petitioner
Versus
Hemant Kumar ...Respondent
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent : Ms. Abhilasha Kaundal, Advocate.
Virender Singh, Judge(oral)
PetitionerBasant Kumar has filed the present
revision petition against the judgment dated 18.06.2022,
passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Sundernagar, District Mandi (hereinafter referred to as the
'Appellate Court'), in Criminal Appeal No.195/2018, titled
as Basant Kumar versus Hemant Kumar.
2. By way of judgment dated 18.06.2022, the
learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by
the petitioner against the judgment of conviction dated
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
12.09.2018 and order of sentence dated 15.09.2018,
passed by the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial
.
Magistrate, Court No.1, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.,
(hereinafter referred to as the 'trial Court'), in Criminal
Case No.212I/2016, titled as Hemant Kumar versus
Basant Kumar.
3. Vide judgment of conviction 12.09.2018 and
order of sentence dated 15.09.2018, learned trial Court has
convicted the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the
accused'), for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of
the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as
the 'NI Act') and sentenced him to undergo simple
imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a
compensation of Rs.49,500/ to the complainant.
4. After dismissal of the appeal by the learned
Appellate Court, the present revision petition has been
preferred.
5. Along with the revision petition, before this
Court, an application bearing Cr.MP No.3083 of 2023, has
been moved by the accused for compounding of the
offence, on the ground, that entire amount of compensation
has been paid by the accused to complainant Hemant
Kumar. It has also been averred that the matter has been
.
settled between the parties, as such, a request has been
made to permit the accused to compound the offence.
6. Factual position, as mentioned in the
application, as well as, receipt of the amount has not been
disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
7. Considering all these facts, the present revision
petition as well as, the application, under Section 482
Cr.PC, read with Section 147 of the NI Act is allowed. The
judgment of conviction dated 12.09.2018 and order of
sentence dated 15.09.2018, passed by learned trial Court
in Criminal Case No.212I/2016, which has been affirmed
by learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal
No.195/2018, vide judgment dated 18.06.2022, are set
aside and the accused is acquitted from the offence,
punishable under Section 138 NI Act. His personal and
surety bonds are cancelled and discharged.
8. However, this order shall be, subject to deposit
of 10% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee, with
the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal Services Authority,
Shimla, within a period of four weeks from today.
.
9. It is further clarified that if the accused fails to
deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court,
within a period of four weeks, then, the present petition
shall be deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the
judgment of conviction dated 12.09.2018 and order of
sentence, dated 15.09.2018, passed by learned trial Court
and in that eventuality, he shall surrender before the
learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence,
imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court.
10. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any,
shall also stand disposed of.
( Virender Singh ) Judge
August 25, 2023(ps)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!