Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10892 HP
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1719/2023
.
Decided on: 03.08.2023
______________________________________________________________
Amit Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
_
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj,
Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional
Advocate General.
Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral)
Fresh status report stands filed.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has been
joining the investigation as and when called by the
Investigating Officer.
3. The learned Additional Advocate General, on
instructions received from ASI Bhajan Singh, P.S.
Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P., has submitted that the
investigation is complete and nothing remains to be
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
recovered from the petitioner. He further submitted that
.
custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.
Furthermore, there is no evidence on record to suggest
that the petitioner will tamper with the prosecution
evidence, if released on bail and there is also nothing on
record to suggest that the petitioner will abscond and flee
Therefore, r in to from justice, if enlarged on bail.
4. view of the
circumstances of the case, since the investigation in the facts and
case is complete and nothing remains to be recovered
from the petitioner, coupled with the fact that his
custodial interrogation is not required, the petitioner
deserves to be released on bail in case F.I.R. No. 71/2023,
dated 03.07.2023, under Sections 353 & 332 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Prevention of
Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, registered at Police
Station Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P. Accordingly, the
bail application is allowed and the interim order dated
07.07.2023, is made absolute, subject to the following
conditions:-
"(i) That the petitioner will appear before the Court and the Investigating Officer whenever required;
(ii) That he will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person
.
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade him/her from disclosing any facts to the Court or the police;
(iii) That he will not tamper with the prosecution evidence nor they will try to win over the prosecution witnesses in any manner;
(iv) That he will not leave India without prior
permission of the Court."
5. Needless to say that the Investigating agency
shall be at liberty to move this Court for cancellation of the
bail, if any of the aforesaid conditions is violated by the
petitioner.
( Sushil Kukreja )
August 03, 2023 Judge
(raman)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!