Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sparsh Sharma And Ors vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 9515 HP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9515 HP
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2022

Himachal Pradesh High Court
Sparsh Sharma And Ors vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Anr on 18 November, 2022
Bench: Sabina, Sushil Kukreja
                                            1




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                                               CWP No.2119 of 2022

                                                  Decided on: 18th November, 2022




                                                                      .

           Sparsh Sharma and Ors.                                   ... Petitioners
                                         Versus





           State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr                         ... Respondents


        Coram
        The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sabina, Judge.





        The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
        Whether approved for reporting?1
        For the petitioners          :   Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate.

        For the respondents No. :        Mr. Anil Jaswal and Mr. Ashwani Sharma,

                                         Additional Advocates General.


    Sabina , Judge, (Oral)



                                ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners have filed the petition

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:-

"(i). That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued by directing the respondent to grant the pay scale/pay band of Rs.10,300-34,800+grade pay 5400/- instead of grade

pay 5000/- from the date of their joining i.e 14.05.2018 after the issuance of the notifications on the post of Block Development Officers with all consequential benefits in the interest of law and justice.

(ii). That the respondents may be directed to fix the pay and pension of the petitioners on the basis of grade pay of Rs.5400/- in view of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble High Court in CWP No.3660/2012 titled as Kulbir Singh Rana & others vs State of H.P & Anr. decided on 20.09.2012(Annexure

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

P-1) has been implemented, in similar situation Jeet Ram's this Hon'ble Court has also allowed the CWP's No. 1641 /2020, 1642/2020 & 1538 of 2020 filed by Smt. Pushpa Devi, Sh. Satish Kumar and Sh. Atma Ram respectively on 17.06.2020 & 18.06.2020 has been allowed.

.

(iii) That the respondents may further be directed to calculate and pay the leave encashment and retirement gratuity on the basis of grade pay 5400/- in view of judgment rendered by this Hon'ble Court in CWP No. 3660/2012 titled as

Kulbir Singh Rana & others versus State of H.P. & Anr. (Annexure P-2).

(iv) That the respondent may be directed to grant all consequential relief's in pursuance to pay fixation the pay band

of Rs. 10,300-34,800 with grade pay Rs. 5400/- in the interest of law and justice".

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the case

of the petitioners is covered by the decisions given by this Court in CWP No.

3660 of 2012, titled Kulbir Singh Rana and others versus State of

Himachal Pradesh and another, decided on 20.09.2012 (Annexure P-2)

and CWP No. 1538 of 2020 titled Atma Ram versus State of Himachal

Pradesh and another, decided on 18.06.2020 (Annexure P-3) and CWP

No. 5074 of 2020 titled Anmol and others versus State of Himachal

Pradesh and another, decided on 16.03.2021 (Annexure P-4). The order

passed by this Court, Annexure P-4, has been duly implemented by the

respondents vide order dated 11.07.2022. At this stage, petitioners would

be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to consider the case of the

petitioners in terms of the decisions given by this Court vide Annexures

P-2,P-3 and P-4.

3. Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, this

petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and

decide the case of the petitioners in terms of the decisions given by this

.

Court vide Annexures P-2 ,P-3 and P-4, within a period of eight weeks from

the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Pending miscellaneous application(s) if any, shall also stand

disposed of.

5. For compliance, list on 03.03.2023.

                            r            to                          (Sabina)
                                                                      Judge


                                                                (Sushil Kukreja)



                                                                    Judge
         November 18, 2022
           (Subhash/Gaurav)








 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter