Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10017 HP
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
.
COPC No. 344 of 2022 Decided on: 28.11.2022
Sameer Mitra .....Petitioner.
Versus
Sh. Subhasis Panda & Ors. .....Respondents.
Coram r The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl. Advocate General
and Mr. Manoj Bagga, Asstt.
Advocate General.
Satyen Vaidya (Oral)
It has been jointly stated by the parties that in
compliance to order dated 02.05.2022 passed by the Division
Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2620 of 2022, the petitioner
has been reinstated.
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. In view of this, nothing survives in this petition and
the same is accordingly disposed of.
.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that he may be granted opportunity to get his
grievance with respect to delay in reinstatement redressed, in
accordance with law. I am of the considered view that no such
liberty can be reserved by this Court in contempt proceedings.
However, the petitioner can always avail such remedy, if it is
otherwise available to him in accordance with law.
( Satyen Vaidya), Judge
November 28, 2022
(vs)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!