Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3313 HP
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2022
Amar Lal vs. State of H.P. & ors.
Ex. Pet. No. 411 of 2021
.
in CWP No. 2140 of 2019.
11.05.2022 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur and Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Arwind Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Narender Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents- State.
Respondent No. 2 present in person.
The judgment sought to be executed r was rendered on
6.8.2021. Despite pre-emptory orders passed on 3.3.2022,
21.3.2022 and 19.4.2022, the respondents have still not
implemented the judgment. Learned Advocate General has
submitted that the Letters Patent Appeal filed against the
judgment in question has been listed before the Additional
Registrar (Judl.) for service of the respondents. The fact remains
that there is no interim order as on date against the judgment.
Respondents, therefore, are duty bound in law to comply the
same. Though there is no reason to further adjourn the matter in
view of the previous orders passed in the petition, however, at
the persuasive request made by the learned Advocate General,
by way of sheer indulgence, the matter is adjourned by two
weeks to give one more opportunity to the respondents to
implement the judgment in question, failing which, appropriate
orders shall be passed in the matter on the next date of hearing.
Respondent No. 2 shall remain present in the Court on the next
date of hearing.
List on 26th May, 2022.
May 11, 2022 (Jyotsna Rewal Dua),
(PK) Judge.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!