Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4415 HP
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
ON THE 13th DAY OF JUNE, 2022
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 3574 of 2022
Between:-
SATISH THAKUR S/O SH. MAHANT RAM
R/O VILLAGE NARGI, POST OFFICE
SMAILA, TEHSIL BALDWARA, DISTRICT
MANDI AGED 57 YEARS, PRESENTLY
WORKING AS PRINCIPAL AT GSSS
MANDWATCH DISTRICT SIRMOUR (HP).
......PETITIONER
(BY MR. RAJ THAKUR,
ADVOCATE.)
AND
1. STATE OF H.P. THROUGH
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
(EDUCATION) TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH, SHIMLA-2.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER
EDUCATION, HIMACHAL
PRADESH, SHIMLA-1.
......RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. ASHOK SHARMA,
ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH
MR. RAJINDER DOGRA,
SENIOR ADDITIONAL
ADVOCATE GENERAL, MR.
SHIV PAL MANHANS
ADDITIONAL ADVOATE
::: Downloaded on - 13/06/2022 20:02:13 :::CIS
-2-
GENERAL, MR. YUDHVIR
SINGH THAKUR AND MR.
BHUPINDER THAKUR, DEPUTY
ADVOCATES GENERAL)
.
1 WHETHER APPROVED FOR REPORTING?
This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Mr.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, passed the following :-
ORDER
Notice. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy
Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents-State.
2. The instant petition has been filed for the grant
of following substantive relief:-
"That the case of the petitioner be considered sympathetically and respondents may please be directed
to transfer the present petitioner to GSSS Baldwara District Mandi, GSSS Tikkri Sadhwani District Mandi, GSSS Parsada_Hawani district Mandi
as posts of principal (School Cadre) are going to vacant on 30.04.2022.
2. Perusal of the petition would go to reveal that
save and except individual hardship, there is no other
factual or legal ground set out in the petition.
3. As regards the individual hardship, it is more
than settled that the same is required to be considered by
the Employer. Reference in this regard can conveniently be
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
made to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Rajendra Roy vs. Union of India & Anr. (1993) 1 SCC
148.
.
4. In the given facts and circumstances of the
case, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition by
directing the respondents to consider and decide the
representation made by the petitioner sympathetically
within a period of four weeks from today, taking into
consideration the fact that the father of the petitioner is 84
years of age and has undergone bypass Surgery and he is
suffering from acute COPD. Likewise, the mother of the
petitioner is more than 80 years of age and suffering from
hypertension and under treatment in Medical College Ner-
Chowk, Mandi. Ordered accordingly. Pending
application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
5. For compliance, to come up on 11th July,
2022.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
13th June, 2022 (himani/raman)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!