Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Budhi Singh vs State Of Himachal
2022 Latest Caselaw 33 HP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 33 HP
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2022

Himachal Pradesh High Court
Shri Budhi Singh vs State Of Himachal on 3 January, 2022
Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel
                               1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                 ON THE 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2022




                                                          .

                            BEFORE

           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL





                  CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (MAIN) U/S 482 CRPC
                  No. 749 of 2021
     Between:-
1.   SHRI BUDHI SINGH, S/O SHRI





     KISHORI  LAL,   AGED    34
     YEARS.

2.   SH. VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 32
     YEARS, S/O SHRI KISHORI
     LAL.


     BOTH      R/O        VILLAGE
     BHARMARA, P.O.       KUTHER,
     TEHSIL JAWALI,       DISTRICT
     KANGRA, H.P.



                                       ...PETITIONERS
     (BY SHRI ASHOK CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE)




     AND





1.   STATE     OF     HIMACHAL
     PRADESH    THROUGH     ITS
     SECRETARY (HOME) TO THE
     GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL





     PRADESH, SHIMLA, HIMACHAL
     PRADESH.

2.   NEHA DEVI, D/O SHRI DES RAJ,
     W/O SHRI TARSEM, R/O VPO
     PALERA VIA LUNJ, TEHSIL AND
     DISTRICT KANGRA, H.P.
                               ...RESPONDENTS
     (SHRI ASHOK  SHARMA, ADVOCATE
     GENERAL, WITH M/S SUMESH RAJ,




                                         ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:32:24 :::CIS
                                         2

       ADARSH SHARMA AND SANJEEV SOOD,
       ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERALS, FOR
       R-1.




                                                                      .

       SHRI M. A. SAFEE, ADVOCATE, FOR R-2)
       Whether approved for reporting? No.
__________________________________________________________
              This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court passed the





following:
                                   JUDGMENT

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of FIR No.

270/2012, dated 26.11.2012, registered under Sections 498A, 342 & 323 of

the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Jawali as well as ensuing criminal

proceedings pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First

Class, Jawali, District Kangra in Case No. 175-1/2013.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well

as learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and learned Additional Advocate

General.

3. Respondent No. 2, Neha Devi, who is present in person

in the Court, has been duly identified by her counsel Mr. M.A. Safee,

Advocate. Her statement has also been independently recorded in the

Court, wherein she has stated that she has entered into a compromise with

the accused and she is not interested in pursuing the matter which led to

registration of FIR No. 270/2012, dated 26.11.2012, registered under

Sections 498A, 342 & 323 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station

Jawali as well as ensuing criminal proceedings pending before the Court of

.

learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jawali, District Kangra in Case No.

175-1/2013. Copy of compromise deed so arrived at between the parties is

appended with the petition as Annexure P-3 and execution of the same as

also the contents thereof have also been acknowledged by respondent No.

2.

4. Learned Additional Advocate General has also very

fairly submitted that the respondent-State has no objection in case petition

is allowed and FIR in issue as well as ensuing criminal proceedings are

quashed and set aside.

5. Accordingly, in view of the above, this petition is allowed

and FIR No. 270/2012, dated 26.11.2012, registered under Sections 498A,

342 & 323 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Jawali as well as

ensuing criminal proceedings pending before the Court of learned Judicial

Magistrate First Class, Jawali, District Kangra in Case No. 175-1/2013 are

quashed and set aside, taking into consideration the compromise entered

between the complainant and accused and a statement to this effect, made

by respondent No. 2 in this Court. The compromise deed Annexure P-3 as

well as statement of the complainant made today in the Court shall form

part of the judgment. Miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand

disposed of.

.

                                              (Ajay Mohan Goel)
                                                  Judge
January 03, 2022
 (bhupender)





                      r         to










 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter