Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7101 HP
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ON THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST, 2022,
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
&
.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
CWP No. 5568 of 2022
Between:
SANGEETA CHAUDHARY, W/O SH.
NARESH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE KOLAR, P.O.
DHAULAKUAN, TEHSIL PAONTA
SAHIB, DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P.
PRESENTLY WORKING AS
LECTURER SCHOOL NEW (HINDI)
AT GOVT. SR. SEC. SCHOOL
BIRLA, TEHSIL DADAHU,
DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P.
...PETITIONER
(BY MR. VINOD CHAUHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY
(EDUCATION) TO THE GOVT. OF
HIMACHAL PARDESH, SHIMLA-2
2. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER
EDUCATION, HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA 171002.
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR HIGHER
EDUCATION NAHAN, DISTRICT
SIRMOUR, H.P.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. ASHOK SHARMA, ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR.
VINOD THAKUR, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL, MR.
YUDHVIR SINGH THAKUR, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL AND
MR. RAJAT CHAUHAN, LAW OFFICER.
_____________________________________________________________
::: Downloaded on - 25/08/2022 20:04:14 :::CIS
2
WHETHER APPROVED FOR REPORTING?
This petition coming on for orders this day,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, passed the
following:
.
ORDER
Issue Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents.
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of
following substantive relief(s):
i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to transfer the petitioner from Govt. Sr. Sec. School Birla to GSSS r Tokio, GSSS Bholiyo and GSSS Kishanpura, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,
District Sirmour where the post of Lecturer School New (Hindi) is lying vacant, keeping in view of her adverse family circumstances in the interest of justice.
ii) That the respondents may very kindly
be directed to decide the
representation of the petitioner
contained in Annexure P-4 (colly) in a
time bound manner.
iii) That the respondents may kindly be
directed to produce the entire record pertaining to the case of the applicant for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.
2. A perusal of the petition would go to reveal that
save and except individual hardship, there is no other factual
or legal ground set out in the petition.
3. As regards the individual hardship, it is more
.
than settled that the same is required to be considered by the
Employer. Reference in this regard can conveniently be made
to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajendra
Roy vs. Union of India & Anr., (1993) 1 SCC 148.
4. In the given facts and circumstances of the case,
we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition by directing
the respondents concern to consider the case of the petitioner
sympathetically within a period of four weeks from today.
Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s) if any, also stands
disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh) Judge
August 24, 2022 (Vinod/Subhash)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!