Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4344 HP
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 4th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
CIVIL WRIT PETITION (ORIGINAL APPLICATION) NO.7597
OF 2019
Between:-
APOORAV KUMAR SAHA
SON OF SH. LAXMI NARAYAN SAHA,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O.
DUMAR, P.S. PALKA,
DISTRICT KATIHAR, BIHAR
PRESENTLY WORKING AS HELPER ON
DEPUTATION IN THE OFFICE OF
SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD.,
DIVYA KUNJ BUILDING, PHASE-III,
OPPOSITE BLOCK NO.9, NEW SHIMLA-
171009 (H.P.)
....PETITIONER
(BY MS.SEEMA AZAD, ADVOCATE
VICE MR. VASU SOOD, ADVOCATE)
AND
H.P.S.E.B. LTD., THROUGH ITS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PERSONNEL).
H.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
VIDYUT BHAWAN, SHIMLA-171004
....RESPONDENT
(BY SH.ANIL KUMAR GOD,
ADVOCATE)
Whether approved for reporting?
This petition coming on for hearing this day, the
Court passed the following:
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:00:46 :::CIS
2
JUDGMENT
Present petition has been filed seeking direction to
the respondent to correct Date of Birth of the petitioner in the
.
service record as 20.07.1967 instead of 20.07.1961 as indicated
in the Certificate (Annexure A-1) issued by the Registrar Births
and Deaths, Gram Panchayat Doomar, Block Sameli, District
Katihar, Bihar.
2. Petitioner has set up his claim for correction of Date
of Birth from 20.07.1961 to 20.07.1967 on the basis of Certificate
Annexure A-1. To substantiate his claim, petitioner has placed on
record School Transfer Certificate (Annexure A-2) issued on
05.03.1986 by Principal Basmati, Harimandal High School,
Pothiya, Katihar, countersigned by District Education Officer,
Katihar. At Serial No.4 of this Certificate, date of admission of
petitioner to that school, has been indicated as 31.01.1972 and
at Serial No. 6 as per Admission Register, Date of Birth of
petitioner has been indicated as 20.07.1961 and at Serial No.7
date of school leaving has been mentioned as 31.12.1973 and at
Serial No.8 the class of the petitioner has been mentioned as 9th
Old (8th New)
3. From Certificate (Annexure A-2), it is evident that
during the year 1972-1973 petitioner was studying in 9th (Old)/8th
(New) and, therefore, he had at least completed eight years of
his study in the school and in case his Date of Birth is taken as
20.07.1967 then, his age in the year 1972 would be 5 years, and
it is impossible in normal course that a child at the age of 5 years
would be studying in 8th or 9th class. The Date of Birth indicated
in Annexure A-1 is not reconciling with School Transfer Certificate
(Annexure A-2) and possibility of Date of Birth of petitioner as
.
20.07.1967 is highly improbable, for entries in Certificate
Annexure A-2 referred supra. Therefore, claim of the petitioner
has been demolished on the basis of documents filed with the
petition itself.
4. In view of above, I find no merit in the present
petition. As such, same is dismissed, so also pending
application(s), if any.
r (Vivek Singh Thakur),
Judge.
September 4, 2021
(Purohit)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!