Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2800 HP
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2021
CMPMO No. 115 of 2021
.
04.05.2021 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner through
Video Conferencing.
CMPMO No. 115 of 2021 and CMP No. 5465 of 2021
It is the case of petitioner that he was not properly served
in execution petition wherein he has been arrayed as Judgment Debtor
No.3 and it is only on publication of notice of sale of his property, he
came to know about pendency of execution petition for attachment of
his property and order dated 25.3.2021 passed for sale thereof on
5.5.2021.
It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that now,
as appearing from order passed by Executing Court on 30.7.2019 and
5.12.2019, property of petitioner/Judgment Debtor No.3 has been
attached and vide order dated 25.3.2021 the ex-parte warrant of sale,
for sale of said property on 5.5.2021, has been passed by calling the
report thereof on 11.5.2021.
It is also submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that
Judgment Debtor No.1/respondent No.2 herein namely Ms. Poonam
Sharma has availed loan from respondent No.1 and out of Rs.15 lacs,
she has already paid Rs.11 lacs and further she is ready to make
repayment of balance amount of loan to respondent No.1.
In aforesaid circumstances, prayer for staying the sale of
property of petitioner/Judgment Debtor No.3 has been made.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances and
particularly submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, order dated
25.3.2021 qua the sale of property of petitioner Manoj Kumar (JD
No.3) is stayed till next date of hearing with direction that warrant of
.
sale qua property of petitioner (JD No.3) shall not be executed till next
date of hearing.
Notice to respondent No.1 through registered AD as well
as through counsel Mr.Amit Singh Kanwar, Advocate, District Court,
Shimla whose official as well as residential address shall be provided
by learned counsel for petitioner.
Notice to respondents No. 2 and 3 through RAD as well
as Process Serving Agency for next date of hearing. Steps for service
be taken during the course of day.
List on 03.06.2021.
The petitioner is permitted to produce copy of order
downloaded from the High Court website and the concerned authority
shall not insist for certified copy of the order, however, they may
verify the order from the High Court website or otherwise.
Copy dasti on usual terms.
May 04, 2021 (Vivek Singh Thakur)
(ms) Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!