Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2942 HP
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 1512 of 2020 a/w
.
CMP No. 11790 of 2020 &
CMP No. 6553 of 2021
Decided on: 23.06.2021
M/s Himachal Spirit ...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents
_____________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Hon'ble Mr. Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional
Advocate General, for respondents-
State.
Mr. Karambir Singh Nalwa and Mr. Sunny
Modgil, Advocates, for respondent No. 5.
(Through Video Conferencing)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of
following substantive reliefs:-
"(i) That the letter/order dated 05.05.2020 passed by respondents may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the petitioner may kindly be permitted to sell the ready to move stocks and raw material.
(ii) That the respondents be restrained from interfering in running the unit till the existence of lease agreement."
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner and private
respondents have already resorted to arbitral proceedings by
.
issuing notice to this effect. Therefore, the instant petition has
virtually been rendered infructuous, however, the question of
lifting of the stock, which is lying in the premises of respondent
No. 5, is still at large.
3. The parties are ad idem that the stock in question
belongs to the petitioner and the same can be permitted to be
lifted only after the dues of the official respondents and other
persons and/or Authority(ies) are cleared.
4. As a matter of fact, the prayers in both the
applications are virtually the same, namely, seeking directions to
the official respondents, for permitting the petitioner to lift the
stock.
5. Accordingly, we deem it proper to allow both these
applications by directing the official respondents to permit the
sale of the stock lying in the premises of respondent No. 5, by
associating both the petitioner as also the private respondents.
The sale shall be conducted in such a manner, so as to fetch the
maximum amount of revenue, which is only possible after
resorting to sell through public auction or by competitive
bidding.
6. Accordingly, the official respondents are permitted to
sell the entire stock lying in the premises of respondent No. 5 by
associating the petitioner as also the private respondents and
the same shall be carried out only after wide publicity in the
.
newspaper/television/cable network.
7. In addition thereto, notice shall also be placed at the
conspicuous part of the factory premises as also the office of the
Collectorate. The sale proceeds shall be not distributed to any of
the parties but shall be deposited in the Registry of this Court
and same shall be subject to further orders of this Court.
8. The instant petition stands disposed of in the
aforesaid terms, so also pending applications, if any. Parties are
left to bear their own costs.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
23 rd
June, 2021 Judge
(TM/sanjeev)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!