Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5627 HP
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 8th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7753 OF 2021
Between:-
r to
DALIP SINGH S/O SH. KARAM
CHAND AGED 42 YEARS, R/O
VILLAGE SHAWAT, POST OFFICE
VIRGARH, TEHSIL KUMARSAIN,
DISTRICT SHIMLA, H.P.,
OCCUPATION PUBLIC SERVANT.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SH. LALIT K. SHARMA AND
SH. ABHISHEK THAKUR,
ADVOCATES)
AND
1. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE
BAGHAT URBAN CO-OPERATIVE
BANK LTD. H.O. BAGHAT BANK
PARISAR, RAJGARH ROAD,
SOLAN, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT
SOLAN, H.P.
2. BRANCH MANAGER, THE
BAGHAT URBAN CO-OPERATIVE
BANK LTD., H.P. BAGHAT BANK
PARISAR RAJGARH ROAD,
SOLAN, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT
SOLAN, H.P.
...RESPONDENTS
(SH. SUDHIR THAKUR, SR.
ADVOCATE WITH SH. KARUN
NEGI, ADVOCATE).
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:24:13 :::CIS
2
This Petition coming on for Order this day, Hon'ble Mr. Justice
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, passed the following:-
.
ORDER
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of
following substantive reliefs:-
(i) That the action of the authorized officer of the respondent bank who despite of the pendency of
Securitization Application No. 169 of 2021, titled Sh. Dalip Singh vs. Authorised Officer The Baghat Urban Co- operative Bank, pending adjudication before DRT-I,
Chandigarh, is harping to take over the physical possession of the house of the petitioner constructed
upon Khata Khatauni No. 24/25, Khasra No. 268/11, measuring 00-02-00 Biswas situated in Muaza Manjh Gaon, Tehsil and District Solan was mortgaged with the
respondent bank may kindly be set aside and quashed.
(ii) That in the absence of Presiding Officer in DRAT Delhi or in DRT Chandigarh, the SA No. 169-2021 of the
petitioner pending before DRT-I Chandigarh may kindly be
transferred to DRT Jaipur which at present is the only functional DRT under the jurisdiction of DRAT Delhi.
(iii) That or in alternate the present petition may kindly be
disposed off in terms of judgments passed by this Hon'ble Court in identical matters viz. (CWP-6647-2021, CWP- 7258-2021, CWP-7108-2021).
(iv) That the respondent bank may directed to re-visit the entire issue of declaring the loan account of the petitioner as NPA in terms of number of circular issued by the RBI providing waiver of interest and interest on interest moratorium and restructuring of re-payment of loan amount especially when the petitioner is ready and willing to settle his loan account.
2. It is not in dispute that neither the DRT, Chandigarh nor
the DRAT, New Delhi are functional for want of appointments of the
.
Presiding Officers. However, as on date, DRT, Jaipur, is the only
functional DRT, under the jurisdiction of DRAT, Delhi.
3. Since, the proceedings have been initiated by the
Bank under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, it is only
the DRT, which has jurisdiction and since the DRT at Japur is
functional, therefore, we direct the petitioner to approach the
DRT, Jaipur.
4. In the given facts and circumstances, we direct the
DRT-I, Chandigarh to transmit the record of SA No. 169 of 2021
(Annexure P-4) to the DRT, Jaipur, who shall take up the
proceedings on 10.01.2022.
5. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid
terms, so also pending application(s), if any.
Copy dasti.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
(Satyen Vaidya)
th
8 December, 2021 Judge
(sanjeev)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!