Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6878 Guj
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/SCR.A/8221/2025 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION - TO LODGE FIR/COMPLAINT)
NO. 8221 of 2025
==========================================================
SURESHBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KAMLESH S KOTAI(6150) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MANAN MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 23/09/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. When the matter is called out, learned APP has produced a report prepared Mr. R.R. Desai, Police Inspector, Prantij Police Station, Sabarkantha. The is taken on record.
2 By way of present petition, the petitioner prays for direction directing the Respondent authorities to lodge the FIR pursuant to the written complaint at (Annexure-A).
3. It appears that the complaint has been filed through a power of attorney holder, as the applicant is residing in the USA and the respondent is also residing abroad. Though the applicant was given ample opportunity to record his statement, he never turned up or appeared before the police authority. Hence, an email was also sent to the applicant informing him about his non-cooperation, and an entry to that effect was made in the station diary.
4. In view of the above, and considering the fact that after approaching the police authority, the applicant did not show any
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/SCR.A/8221/2025 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2025
undefined
interest in getting the complaint registered and even directly approached this Court instead of availing the appropriate remedy available to him, and further in view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in M. Subramaniam vs. S. Janki, (2020) 16 SCC 728, as well as the decision in Imran Pratap Gadhi vs. State of Gujarat, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 678, the present petition stands dismissed.
5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail statutory remedy before appropriate forum. It is hereby made clear that this Court has not examined the merits of the case. Direct service is permitted.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) ALI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!