Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Imtiyazbhai Bodubhai Mor vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 6728 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6728 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Imtiyazbhai Bodubhai Mor vs State Of Gujarat on 18 September, 2025

                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/SCR.A/12765/2025                                  ORDER DATED: 18/09/2025

                                                                                                              undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 12765 of 2025
                       ==========================================================
                                                   IMTIYAZBHAI BODUBHAI MOR
                                                             Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       THAKKAR AND PAHWA ADVOCATES(1357) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR JADEJA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================
                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                                            Date : 18/09/2025

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1) Learned advocate Mr. Pratik Thakkar states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the original complainant, and thereby, seeks permission to file his Vakalatnama, which is granted. The original complainant is present in the Court and is identified by his learned advocate.

2) Rule. Learned advocates waives service of rule for the respective respondents.

3) By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 528 of the BNSS, the petitioner has sought quashing of the judgment and order dated 05.08.2024, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jetpur, in Criminal Case No. 935/2020, by which the petitioner has been convicted and ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay the amount of Rs.2,20,000/- towards compensation to the complainant and in default of payment of the said amount, the petitioner to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of six months. The said order came to be confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jetpur, vide order dated 31.07.2025 in Criminal Appeal

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/12765/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/09/2025

undefined

No.26/2024.

4) It appears that the settlement has been arrived at between the complainant and present petitioner and the entire cheque amount has been paid to the respondent complainant, which has been confirmed by the complainant by detailed affidavit, which is produced on record separately, the same is taken on record. The complainant do not wish to proceed further and is willing to compound the offence. Accordingly, the petitioner by filing this petition, seeks compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

5) The petitioner also submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit costs as directed by the Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H., reported in (2010) 5 SCC 633, with the Legal Service Authority.

6) In case of Kripalsingh Pratapsingh Vs. Salvinder Kaur Hardisingh Lohana reported in (2004)2 GLH 544, the Coordinate Bench of this Court after considering various decisions of the Apex Court, took a view that it would be permissible for the High Court in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code, to record the settlement arrived at between the parties and acquit the accused of the charges.

7) Thus, taking into account the fact of settlement, the compounding of the offence is hereby permitted.

8) As a result, the petition is ALLOWED. The judgment and order dated 05.08.2024, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jetpur, in Criminal Case No. 935/2020 as well as order

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/12765/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/09/2025

undefined

dated 31.07.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jetpur, in Criminal Appeal No.26/2024 are hereby quashed and set aside. The petitioner is acquitted of the offences under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.33,000/- (15% of the cheque amount) with the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority within a period of one week from the date of receipt of this order.

9) If the petitioner is in jail, the jail authority concerned is directed to release the petitioner forthwith, if not required in connection with any other case. Rule is made absolute to aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted.

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)

SUCHIT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter