Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The National Insurance Co.Ltd vs Raval Surajben Wd/O. Rumalbhai ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 5446 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5446 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2025

Gujarat High Court

The National Insurance Co.Ltd vs Raval Surajben Wd/O. Rumalbhai ... on 3 April, 2025

                                                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




                               C/FA/806/2023                                    ORDER DATED: 03/04/2025

                                                                                                                 undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                                 R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 806 of 2023

                       ==========================================================
                                        THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD
                                                    Versus
                              RAVAL SURAJBEN WD/O. RUMALBHAI SHANKARBHAI & ORS.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MS LILU K BHAYA(1705) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
                       MR M A CHAUHAN(11262) for the Defendant(s) No. 1,3
                       RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 2,4,5,6,7
                       ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI

                                                            Date : 03/04/2025

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Lilu Bhaya for the appellant.

Learned advocate Mr. M. A. Chauhan appearing for

respondent Nos.1 and 3 remained absent. Though rule

was served upon rest of the respondents, they remained

absent. Perused the record.

2. The challenge in the present appeal is by the original

opponent No. 4 - Insurance Company challenging the

judgment and award dated 6.4.2018 passed by learned

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Mahisagar at

Lunawada in M.A.C.P. No.1655 of 2017.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/806/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/04/2025

undefined

3. The facts in brief of the case are as under:

* On 1.5.2009, deceased was riding a scooter

No.GJ-6QQ-6438 and when he reached near Kanod Padedi

village in a moderate speed. The opponent No.1 - was

driving his motorcycle bearing registration No.GJ-17-H-

6515 in a rash and negligent manner from the opposite

direction and dashed with the deceased. Resultantly,

deceased sustained serious injuries and succumbed.

* Claimants being the legal heirs of the

deceased filed Claim Petition being MACP No.1655 of

2017 before learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

(Aux), Mahisagar at Lunawada for a compensation of

Rs.6,00,000/- from the opponents. Opponents were

served with summons.

* Opponent No.1 appeared but did not file

written statement. The claim petition was resisted by

Insurance Company - respondent No.4 by filing Written

Statement at Exh.21 and denied its liability. After framing

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/806/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/04/2025

undefined

of issues, claimant No.1 submitted examination-in-chief

at Exh.28 and produced FIR, Panchnama, PM report and

documents to substantiate income of deceased.

* After considering the evidence, learned

Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition by directing

opponents to pay an amount of Rs.4,35,664/- to the

claimants with interest @ 9% p.a. with proportionate cost

from the date of application till realisation by holding

driver of the scooterist negligent to the extent of 30%

and the driver of the motorcycle to the extent of 70%.

* Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the

impugned judgment and award, the Insurance Company -

appellant has filed the present appeal.

4. Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the

learned tribunal has held deceased negligent to the extent

of 30%, however, while awarding the total compensation,

deduction of 30% is missed out. It is submitted that

towards negligence, Rs.1,30,699/- is required to be

deducted from the total amount of compensation of

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/806/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/04/2025

undefined

Rs.4,35,664/- Except the above submissions, no other

submissions are made.

5. I have considered the submissions of learned advocate for

the appellant and perused the impugned judgment and

award. It appears that learned tribunal while considering

the question of negligence has held that the deceased was

negligent to the extent of 30% however, in the operative

part of the order, learned tribunal has not given deduction

of 30% from total award of compensation. When learned

tribunal has observed in the discussion part with regard to

negligence, deduction of 30% ought to have been

considered while passing the final order. Resultantly, it

appears that there is an error committed by learned

Tribunal in calculating compensation.

6. In view of above, the present First Appeal is allowed. The

claimant is entitled to Rs.3,04,965/- (Rs.4,35,664/- minus

Rs,1,30,699/-) from the opponents with interest @ 9% p.a.

from the date of application till realisation. No order as to

costs. Interim Relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/FA/806/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/04/2025

undefined

7. Record and Proceedings, if any, be sent back to the

concerned Court / Tribunal, forthwith.

(D. M. DESAI,J) vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter