Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8634 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/40/2011 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 40 of 2011
================================================================
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER
Versus
SHANTABEN JIVABHAI ROHIT SINCE.DECD. THROUGH HEIR & ORS.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR.SHASHIKANT PARMAR(6346) for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2,3
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 4,5
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Date : 11/09/2024
ORAL ORDER
1. The present First Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and award dated 23.09.2010 passed by the learned Motor Accident Tribunal (Main), Anand, Valsad in MACP No.1/2019.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under:-
2.1 On 21.11.2008, the mother of the appellant was travelling in the Rickshaw being Registration No.GJ 23 U 349 which was being driven by the opponent No.1 with full speed in negligent manner and thereafter, the said rickshaw turned turtle and the mother the appellant died on the spot. The legal heirs of the deceased filed the claim petition for compensation of Rs.3,16,500/- along with interest from the opponents, which was partly allowed by the learned Tribunal.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/40/2011 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2024
undefined
3. Heard learned advocate Mr. Rathin P. Raval for the appellant and learned advocate Mr. Shashikant Parmar for respondents as well as perused the record.
4. Considering the submissions as well as various grounds raised in the memo of appeal, the fact remains that the total amount involved in the appeal is only Rs.1,14,500/-. Considering the smallness of amount, this Court is of the view that jurisdiction under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, cannot be exercised.
5. It is made clear that only on the ground of smallness of amount, this order may not be considered as precedent in other claim petitions arising out of the same accident and hence, the appeal stands disposed of. No order as to costs.
6. Record and proceedings be sent back to the learned Tribunal.
(D. M. DESAI,J) RINKU MALI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!