Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhanjibhai Ramanbhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat
2024 Latest Caselaw 5195 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5195 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Dhanjibhai Ramanbhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat on 21 June, 2024

Author: Gita Gopi

Bench: Gita Gopi

                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/CR.RA/610/2024                                     ORDER DATED: 21/06/2024

                                                                                          undefined




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
          NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 610 of 2024

==========================================================
                        DHANJIBHAI RAMANBHAI PARMAR
                                    Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
DARSHIT R BRAHMBHATT(8011) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

                                Date : 21/06/2024

                                   ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr. Chirag Brahmbhatt submits that he has instruction to appear on behalf of original complainant. He may file his Vakalatnama before Registry. Registry to accept the same.

2. Challenge in this Revision Application is given to the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 31.01.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kheda in Criminal Case no.992 of 2019, which was confirmed by the judgment and order dated 30.01.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Jude, Kheda in Criminal Appeal no.61 of 2023.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/610/2024 ORDER DATED: 21/06/2024

undefined

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that during the pendency of the proceedings, parties have settled the disputes amicably outside the Court and that there remains no grievance between them.

4. Learned advocate for respondent no.2 - original complainant has placed on record the affidavit of settlement filed by the respondent no.2-original complainant and stated that the proposed settlement amount, as agreed between the parties, has already been paid. The same is taken on record.

5. Today, Mukeshgiri Kailashgiri Goswami-respondent no.2 is present before this Court and the respondent no.2 has affirmed the contents of the affidavit and is identified by learned advocate for respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 has further stated that total amount of Rs.2,60,000/- had to be recovered from the present applicant and by way of affidavit, he stated that the total amount has been received.

6. Since the complainant has given consent for compounding the offence, keeping in mind the object of Section 147 of the NI Act, which is an enabling provision which provides for compounding the offence and may require

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/610/2024 ORDER DATED: 21/06/2024

undefined

the consent of the aggrieved for compounding the offence, however, the specific provision under Section 147, inserted by way of amendment towards special law, would give overriding effect to sub-section (1) of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as has been observed in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Baba Lal, AIR 2010 SC 1907. Accordingly, as the dispute has been resolved and the entire amount has been paid to the complainant, in consonance with the object of the N.I. Act and the provisions under Section 147 thereof, the matter is considered as compounded.

7. In aforesaid view of the matter, the judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court of conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act, as affirmed by the learned Appellate Court, are quashed and set aside. The applicant stands acquitted.

8. It is further stated by the learned advocate for the petitioner that an amount of Rs.1,30,000/- is deposited before the trial Court. Since, original complainant has received the total amount from the petitioner - accused, the concerned Court is directed to disburse the amount of Rs.1,30,000/- to the original accused - Dhanjibhai Ramanbhai Parmar on proper verification of the identity.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/610/2024 ORDER DATED: 21/06/2024

undefined

9. Accordingly, the present application is allowed in the above terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(GITA GOPI,J) DRASHTI K. SHUKLA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter