Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajitbhai Rahemanbhai Pathan vs State Of Gujarat
2024 Latest Caselaw 4940 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4940 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Ajitbhai Rahemanbhai Pathan vs State Of Gujarat on 19 June, 2024

Author: Gita Gopi

Bench: Gita Gopi

                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




      R/CR.RA/869/2024                                     ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

                                                                                           undefined




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION) NO. 869
                           of 2024

==========================================================
                          AJITBHAI RAHEMANBHAI PATHAN
                                      Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VEVANSH KAKKAD ADVOCATE FOR MR PARVEZ A PATHAN(10862)
for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR HARDIK MEHTA APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

                                    Date : 19/06/2024

                                      ORAL ORDER

1. Advocate Mr. Adil Husain Saiyed is

present before the Court through video

conferencing along with original complainant and

states that he has instruction to appear on

behalf of respondent no.2 - original complainant

and seeks permission to file Vakalatname.

Permission to file Vakalatnma is granted; the

same be taken on record.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/869/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

undefined

notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent no.2 -

State and Mr. Adil Husain Saiyed, learned

advocate waives service of notice of Rule on

behalf of the respondent no.2.

3. By way of this application, the

applicant - revisionist challenges the judgment

of conviction and sentence dated 02.07.2022

passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Bharuch in Criminal Case No.728 of 2019 under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,

1881, which came to be confirmed by order dated

08.01.2024 by the learned Principal District and

Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Criminal Appeal No.656

of 2022.

4. Learned advocate Mr. Vevansh Kakkad for

Mr. Parvesh Pathan, learned advocate for the

applicant - revisionist stated that the matter

has been settled between the parties. It is

stated that the all the cheque amount has been

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/869/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

undefined

paid to the complainant.

4.1 Mr. Vinodchandra Ramanlal Modi -

original complainant appeared before the Court

through video conferencing along with Advocate

Mr. Adil Husain Saiyed.

4.2 The affidavit of the original

complainant is on record, who affirms that the

the matter has been settled between the parties

out side the Court and he has received the cheque

amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, and the complainant does

not want to pursue the matter now in view of

amicable settlement and has given consent for

compounding the offence.

5. Since the complainant has given consent

for compounding the offence, keeping in mind the

object of Section 147 of the NI Act, which is an

enabling provision which provides for compounding

the offence and may require the consent of the

aggrieved for compounding the offence, however,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/869/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

undefined

the specific provision under Section 147,

inserted by way of amendment towards special law,

would give overriding effect to sub-section (1)

of Section 320 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

(CrPC) as has been observed in the case of

Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Baba Lal, AIR 2010 SC

1907. Accordingly, as the dispute has been

resolved and the entire amount has been paid to

the complainant, in consonance with the object of

the N.I. Act and the provisions under Section 147

thereof, the matter is considered as compounded.

6. In aforesaid view of the matter, the

judgment and order passed by the learned Trial

Court of conviction and sentence for the offence

punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act, as

affirmed by the learned Appellate Court, are

quashed and set aside. The applicant stands

acquitted and be released forthwith from the

jail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/869/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/06/2024

undefined

7. Accordingly, the present application

stands disposed of in the above terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted. Registry to communicate

this order to the concerned Court/authority by

Fax or Email forthwith.

(GITA GOPI,J) Pankaj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter