Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Xyz vs State Of Gujarat
2023 Latest Caselaw 7231 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7231 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Xyz vs State Of Gujarat on 3 October, 2023
Bench: Samir J. Dave
                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/SCR.A/12864/2023                                     ORDER DATED: 03/10/2023

                                                                                          undefined




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 12864 of 2023

==========================================================
                                        XYZ
                                       Versus
                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS DIPMALA S DESAI(6596) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR H. K. PATEL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMIR J. DAVE

                                  Date : 03/10/2023
                                   ORAL ORDER

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs;

"(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to admit and allow this petition;

(B) Your Lordships be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, permitting the victim- petitioner to terminate her on going pregnancy of 24 weeks 5 days as reported on 23.09.2023 at approved Government Hospital on such terms and conditions as may be deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice;

(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside order dated 23.09.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.3401 of 2023 by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot, while permitting the petitioner to terminate her on going pregnancy of 24 weeks 5 days as reported on

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/12864/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2023

undefined

23.09.2023 at approved Government Hospital on such terms and conditions as may be deemed.

(D) Your Lordships be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 i.e. the in-charge Medical Officer of the General Hospital, Rajkot, or any other Government Hospital to undertake necessary medical tests of victim/ petitioner about physical and medical fitness to undergo termination of pregnancy as required under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and to submit the report thereof to this Hon'ble Court with immediate effect for its subject satisfaction;

(E) Your Lordships be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 i.e. the in-charge Medical Officer of the General Hospital, Rajkot, or any other Government Hospital to undertake necessary medical tests of victim/ petitioner about physical and medical fitness to undergo termination of pregnancy as required under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and to submit the report thereof to this Hon'ble Court with immediate effect for its subject satisfaction, pending the admission hearing and final disposal of this petition;

(F) YOUR Lordships be pleased to grant such other and further reliefs, as may be deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice;"

2. Pursuant to the order dated 27.09.2023 passed by this Court, today, learned APP Mr.H.K.Patel produced medical report of the victim girl dated 29.09.2023 prepared by the panel of Doctors of P.D.U. Hospital, Rajkot. The same is taken on record.

3. As per the opinion given by the panel of Doctors in the form of the report dated 29.09.2023, the victim girl is carrying pregnancy of 25 weeks as on 28.09.2023 and no significant systemic abnormality has been detected. The victim also does not show signs of any associated pregnancy complications.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/12864/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2023

undefined

4. At this juncture, a reference to the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in case of X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another reported in AIR 2022 SC 4917 would be apposite. In paragraphs-99 & 116, it has been observed as under;

"99. The right to reproductive autonomy is closely linked with the right to bodily autonomy. As the term itself suggests, bodily autonomy is the right to take decisions about one's body. The consequences of an unwanted pregnancy on a woman's body as well as her mind cannot be understated. The foetus relies on the pregnant woman's body for sustenance and nourishment until it is born. The biological process of pregnancy transforms the woman's body to permit this. The woman may experience swelling, body ache, contractions, morning sickness, and restricted mobility, to name a few of a host of side effects. Further, complications may arise which pose a risk to the life of the woman. A mere description of the side effects of a pregnancy cannot possibly do justice to the visceral image of forcing a woman to continue with an unwanted pregnancy. Therefore, the decision to carry the pregnancy to its full term or terminate it is firmly rooted in the right to bodily autonomy and decisional autonomy of the pregnant woman.

116. In the context of abortion, the right to dignity entails recognising the competence and authority of every woman to take reproductive decisions, including the decision to terminate the pregnancy. Although human dignity inheres in every individual, it is susceptible to violation by external conditions and treatment imposed by the state. The right of every woman to make reproductive choices without undue interference from the state is central to the idea of human dignity. Deprivation of access to reproductive healthcare or emotional and physical well- being also injures the dignity of women."

5. In a recent decision rendered by the Apex Court in Criminal Appeal arising out of S.L.P. (Cri.) Dy.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/12864/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2023

undefined

No.33790 of 2023 dated 21.08.2023, by relying upon the judgment rendered in X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another's case (supra), the Apex Court ordered to conduct medical termination of pregnancy of the victim.

6. In this backdrop, it would be beneficial to refer to a recent decision of the Kerala High Court in the case Aryamol Vs. Union of India and Ors., wherein in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court has gone to the extent of saying that the consent of the husband is not required in a case where the wife desires to terminate her pregnancy thereby giving respect to the desire of the woman and significance to her dignity.

7. If the victim does not want to continue with her pregnancy then this Court cannot compel her to continue her pregnancy.

8. In the result, the application is allowed. The respondent No.3 herein, Chief Medical Officer/ Medical Superintendent, P.D.U. Hospital, Rajkot is directed to take necessary steps for undertaking the procedure of medical termination of pregnancy of the applicant-victim girl at the earliest possible time. The respondent No.2-Police Inspector, Gandhigram Police Station, Rajkot is directed to take necessary

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/12864/2023 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2023

undefined

steps, on urgent basis, so that the procedure of medical termination of pregnancy of the victim girl could be undertaken and concluded at the earliest. It is expected that the respondent-authorities concerned would take necessary care, sensitivity and caution so that the procedure of medical termination of pregnancy of the victim girl could be undertaken smoothly keeping in mind the age as well as mental and physical health of the victim girl.

9. The respondents nos.2-3 are directed to do the needful to preserve the subsequent DNA Test Report by drawing tissues from the foetus for the purpose of using it as a piece of evidence in the ensuing trial.

10. With the above directions, the petition stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute. Direct service TODAY is permitted. A copy of this order be provided to the learned APP for onward communication and necessary action. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty.

(SAMIR J. DAVE,J) MEHUL B. TUVAR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter