Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhurabhai Ambalal Parmar vs Patel Kiranbhai Amratbhai
2023 Latest Caselaw 6364 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6364 Guj
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Bhurabhai Ambalal Parmar vs Patel Kiranbhai Amratbhai on 31 August, 2023
Bench: Hasmukh D. Suthar
                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/CR.RA/1092/2023                                         ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

                                                                                              undefined




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

          R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1092 of 2023

==========================================================
                          BHURABHAI AMBALAL PARMAR
                                    Versus
                          PATEL KIRANBHAI AMRATBHAI
==========================================================
Appearance:
K T BELADIYA(9101) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR LB DABHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                   Date : 31/08/2023

                                    ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well

as learned advocate appearing for the Complainant waive

service of Rule on behalf of the respective respondents.

2. Considering the issue involved in the present

application and with consent of the learned advocates

appearing for the respective parties as well as

considering the fact that the dispute amongst the

applicant and respondent No.2 has been resolved

amicably, this application is taken up for final disposal

forthwith since parties have settled the dispute as

alleged offence is bailable and compoundable.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/1092/2023 ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

undefined

3. By way of this application under Section 397 read

with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code"), the applicant

has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order

dated 11.04.2023 passed by the learned Additional Senior

Civil Judge & Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad in

Criminal Case No.1973 of 2015, whereby the Trial Court

has pleased to pass an order of conviction and sentence

of 1 year of SI and order to pay fine of Rs.13,10,570/-

and ID, he has to undergo further SI for the 3 months.

The said order is assailed before the learned additional

Sessions Judge, Aravalli @ Modasa by way of

impugned Judgment and order of sentence dated nd 18.08.2023 passed by 2 Additional Sessions Judge, Aravalli @ Modasa in Criminal Appeal No. 106 of 2023.

The said appeal came to be dismissed and the order of

conviction has been confirmed and upheld by the

Additional Sessions Judge. Hence, this Revision

Application is filed.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant has taken this

Court through the factual matrix arising out of the

present application. At the outset, it is submitted that

the parties have amicably resolved the issue and

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/1092/2023 ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

undefined

therefore, any further continuance of the proceedings

pursuant to the Criminal Case as well as any further

proceedings arising therefrom would create hardship to

the applicant. It is further submitted that in view of

the fact that the dispute is resolved, the trial would be

futile and any further continuance of the proceedings

would amount to abuse of process of law. It is therefore

submitted that this Court may exercise its powers

conferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the

Code and allow the application as prayed for.

4.1. Learned advocate appearing for the applicant states th that the applicant is in jail since 18 August, 2023 and

matter is settled between the parties.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for

the State has opposed the present application and

submitted that considering the seriousness of the offence,

the complaint in question may not be quashed and the

present application may be rejected.

6. Ms.D.P. Mishra learned advocate for the respondent

No.2 has received instructions to appear on behalf of the

original-complainant. She has file her appearance before

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/1092/2023 ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

undefined

the Registry. Learned advocate Ms.Mishra placed on

record the affidavit of the complainant, which is ordered

to be taken on record.

6.1. Learned advocate for respondent No.2 has

reiterated the contentions raised by the learned advocate

for the applicant. The learned advocate for respondent

No.2 also relied upon the affidavit filed by respondent

No.2 Patel Kiranbhai Amratbhai dated 31.08.2023.

Respondent No.2 is present in person before the Court

and is identified by learned advocate for respondent

No.2. On inquiry made by the Court, respondent No.2

has declared before this Court that the dispute between

the applicant and the respondent No.2 is resolved due to

intervention of trusted persons of the society and

therefore, now the grievance stands redressed. It is

therefore submitted that the present application may be

allowed.

7. At the outset, learned advocates for the respective

parties have jointly submitted that matter is settled and

now the original complainant does not wants to pursue

for the further litigation as complainant and applicant

have settled the matter and in this regard, affidavit of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/1092/2023 ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

undefined

respondent No.2 has been placed, which is taken on

record. The contents of the affidavit is also admitted by

the original complainant. Even complainant has remained

present before this Court and stated that he has no

objection if the conviction recorded by the learned Trial

Court as well as Appellate Court is set aside.

8. Considering the fact that as under Section 147 of

the Negotiable Act, offence is compoundable and

permissible to settle the dispute at any stage, permission

to settle the dispute is required to be allowed. However,

the revisionist has settled the dispute at the level of

High Court after the confirmation by the appellate Court,

the present application may be allowed. Considering the

amount of cheque is Rs.6,00,000/- and awarded

compensation amount is about Rs.13,00,000/- and as the

accused is farmer and having no any financial source,

this Court has considered the said aspect as offence is

compoundable and bailable. Considering the fact that as

applicant has also deposited an amount of Rs.1,31,057/-

before the Court of Sessions Judge, the present

Revisionist has no objection, if the said amount is paid

to the complainant. Nazir of concerned District Court is

directed to pay the amount deposited pursuant to the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/1092/2023 ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

undefined

order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in

Criminal Appeal No.106 of 2023 vide Receipt No.4642242

after due and proper verification to the complainant.

9. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for

the respective parties, considering the facts and

circumstances arising out of the present application and

considering the decision rendered in case of Damodar S.

Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H, reported in 2010(5) SCC

663, it appears that further continuation of criminal

proceedings in relation to the impugned proceeding

against the applicant would be unnecessary harassment

to the applicant.

10. Considering the nature of disputes between the

parties which are all private in nature, I am of the

opinion that the matter requires consideration. It appears

that the trial would be futile and further continuance of

the proceedings of Criminal Case would amount to abuse

of process of law and hence, to secure the ends of

justice, the Criminal Case is required to be quashed

and set aside in exercise of powers conferred upon this

Court.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/1092/2023 ORDER DATED: 31/08/2023

undefined

11. Resultantly, this application is allowed. The order

dated 11.04.2023 passed by the learned Additional Senior

Civil Judge & Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayad in

Criminal Case No.1973 of 2015 as well as impugned

Judgment and order of sentence dated 18.08.2023 passed nd by 2 , Additional Sessions Judge, Aravalli @ Modasa in

Criminal Appeal No. 106 of 2023 stand quashed and set

aside qua the applicant, subject to deposit 15% of the

amount of cheque before the Gujarat High Court Legal

Services Committee within a period of 10 days.

13. On compliance of the said order, the applicant shall

be released on bail, if his presence is no longer required

in any other criminal offence.

14. The present application is allowed qua applicant.


   Rule is made absolute

   Direct service             is permitted.



                                                      (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
KUMAR ALOK







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter