Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13449 Guj
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2021
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9724 of 2021
==========================================================
GAJENDRABHAI RAMBHAI ODEDARA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HR PRAJAPATI(674) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3
MS NISHKA H PRAJAPATI(10717) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3
for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MS MANISHA LAVKUMAR SHAH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER ASSISTED
BY MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.
JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 06/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed
for the following main relief :
"10(a) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction and be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to forthwith make full payment of compensation Rs.4,28,67,585.05 ps. (Rupees Four Crores Twenty Eight Lacs Sixty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Five and Five paisa) decided by the Reference Court in Land Reference Case No.21/2006 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with interest from the date of judgment and order dated 25.09.2018 passed by the Reference Court;"
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
2. Heard Mr.H.R.Prajapati, learned counsel for the
petitioners and Ms.Manisha Lavkumar Shah, learned
Government Pleader with Mr.Tirthraj Pandya, learned
Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent State
authorities.
3. The following facts emerge from the record of
the petition. That the petitioners were owners of
land bearing Survey No.143 part, admeasuring 01-12-30
Hectare-Aare-sq.mtrs. of land situated at Village
Moti Khavdi, Taluka and District Jamnagar. The land
belonging to the petitioners was sought to be
acquired for the public purpose of Jamnagar-Vadinar
State Four Lane road vide Notification dated
29.08.2002 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894. After scrupulously following
the procedure as prescribed under the Act, the land
acquisition proceedings so initiated culminated into
an award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer which
was made and declared on 21.03.2005. The Land
Acquisition Officer determined the market value of
the land under acquisition belonging to the
petitioners at Rs.20/- per sq.meter. The record
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
indicates that the possession of the land belonging
to the petitioners was taken over on 30.05.2005. As
the petitioners being the owners of the land in
question were dissatisfied with the market value so
fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer filed an
application before the Land Acquisition Officer as
provided under Section 18 of the Act, which came to
be referred to the Reference Court and the same was
registered as Land Reference Case No.21 of 2006
before the District Court at Jamnagar.
4. By a judgment and order dated 25.09.2018, the
Land Reference Court was pleased to partly-allow the
Reference Application filed by the petitioners and
awarded total compensation of Rs.4,28,67,585.05ps.
(Rupees Four Crores Twenty Eight Lakhs Sixty Seven
Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Five and Five paise
only) and thus determined the market value of the
land under acquisition at Rs.800/- per sq.meter. Even
after the judgment rendered in the Reference, the
compensation was not paid and therefore several
requests were made and as the said requests were not
acceded to by the respondent authorities, the present
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
petition came to be filed with the prayer as observed
hereinabove.
5. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note
that the present petition was preferred under Article
226 of the Constitution of India on 06.07.2021. The
coordinate Bench of this Court passed the following
order after hearing the parties on 25.08.2021 :
"1. Pursuant to our order dated 23.08.2021, Mr. S.B. Vasava serving as Secretary to the Government of Gujarat, R & B Department, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar is present and duly represented by Ms. Manisha Lavkumar Shah, learned Government Pleader and Ms. Shruti Pathak, learned AGP.
2. An affidavit has also been filed by Mr. Vasava. As per the contents of the affidavit, initially after the judgement of the Reference Court dated 25.09.2018, opinion was called to file an appeal challenging the said judgement of the Reference Court. However, despite two opinions, one from the learned AGP and one from the department and also the recommendation of the Committee concerned to file an appeal, the appeal could not be filed. Today, the stand is that in view of the inordinate delay, the State has decided not to file an appeal and to ensure compliance of the Reference Court's order dated 25.09.2018.
3. Paras 7 to 9 of the affidavit give details of the subsequent decision as also forwarding of a proposal to the revenue department for taking necessary decision regarding the financial aspect. Thereafter, revised proposal is said to have been received by the R & B department on 23.08.2021 for paying an amount of compensation
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
of Rs.4,92,33,609/-. The said proposal has since been forwarded to the finance department for releasing the grant on 24.08.2021 i.e. yesterday. In para 11, a week's further time has been prayed to complete the necessary formalities in ensuring compliance of the judgement of the Reference Court. Necessary communications relating to release of grant by the R & B department have also been annexed.
4. Ms. Manisha Lavkumar Shah, learned Government Pleader submits that within a week, the amount of compensation along with interest and all other payable amounts under different heads would be deposited with the Reference Court from where the petitioners after completing the formalities would be entitled to get the same released in their favour.
5. In para 9 of the affidavit, it is stated that the R & B department has taken decision to accept the decision of the Reference Court with condition to fix the responsibility and to show cause whosoever is found negligent in complying with the decision of the Reference Court in view of the recommendation of the committee. Let this exercise be also completed within a period of one week and the report to that effect may be submitted to this court as to what is the outcome of such inquiry and what steps the government would like to take for the loss suffered by the State.
6. Let this matter be listed again on
06.09.2021."
6. Pursuant to the order dated 25.08.2021, the
State of Gujarat has filed a further affidavit of the
Secretary to Government of Gujarat, Road and Building
Department dated 06.09.2021. At the outset, it is
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
stated that the award of total compensation of
Rs.4,28,67,585.05 ps. (Rupees Four Crores Twenty
Eight Lakhs Sixty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty
Five and Five paise only) as determined by the
Reference Court, Jamnagar in Land Reference Case
No.21 of 2006 has been accepted by the State. It is
also stated in the affidavit that a sum of
Rs.4,92,33,609/- (Rupees Four Crores Ninety Two Lakhs
Thirty Three Thousand Six Hundred and Nine only) has
been deposited before the Reference Court at Jamnagar
on 26.08.2021 and the cheque has been cleared on
31.08.2021. Thus, the prayer prayed for in the
petition stands satisfied. However, before parting,
we would like to refer to the order dated 25.08.2021
wherein the coordinate Bench had issued directions of
inquiry and had expressed its anguish on unnecessary
delay on the part of the State authorities in making
payment of the total compensation as awarded by the
Reference Court. The delay has resulted into monetary
loss to the State exchequer. In furtherance to the
directions issued by the coordinate Bench of this
Court vide order dated 25.08.2021, it is evident from
the further affidavit dated 06.09.2021 that a
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
Committee comprising of six members came to be
constituted and show cause notices came to be issued
to the erring officers, recommendations have been
made and the report has been submitted by the
Committee so constituted as per the order dated
25.08.2021 on 03.09.2021. A Circular dated 03.09.2021
is also issued wherein appropriate instructions have
been issued to all concerned. With pain we observe
that this is not a solitary case of such delay in
making payment of the compensation so awarded by the
Reference Court. It is the duty of the State to see
that all Land Acquisition Officers in the State
strictly adhere to the instructions given by the
State Government vide Circular dated 03.09.2021 in
its true letter and spirit. In case if the respondent
State of Gujarat as well as the respondent
authorities in a given case are not to accept the
market value as determined by the Reference Court, it
is incumbent upon the respondents to challenge the
same within the time prescribed under the Act. The
State Government should therefore further instruct
the Land Acquisition Officer and/or Collector as
defined under the Act to take timely decision and we
C/SCA/9724/2021 ORDER DATED: 06/09/2021
hereby direct the State Government to come out with
further instructions for the same. This exercise
would be necessary to see that no delay occurs in
making payment of compensation which ultimately
burdens the State exchequer with interest as provided
under the Act. Though the prayer prayed for in the
petition stands satisfied as observed hereinabove and
the petition is disposed of, the State Government
shall conduct an appropriate inquiry as stated in the
further affidavit dated 06.09.2021 as per the report
of the Committee constituted by the State Government,
pursuant to the order dated 25.08.2021 passed in this
petition and complete such inquiry as expeditiously
as possible. The State Government shall also issue
further directions as provided in this order.
7. The petition thus stands disposed of. However,
there shall be no orders as to costs.
(THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA, J)
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) GAURAV J THAKER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!