Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maps Enzymes Limited vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 13406 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13406 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Maps Enzymes Limited vs State Of Gujarat on 3 September, 2021
Bench: Gita Gopi
   R/SCR.A/7466/2021                          ORDER DATED: 03/09/2021



          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7466 of 2021
==========================================================
                       MAPS ENZYMES LIMITED
                               Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RAJESH H SAHJANI(5376) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3
MR. HARDIK MUCHHALA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR. PRANAV TRIVEDI, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

                          Date : 03/09/2021

                           ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned APP and learned advocate Mr. Hardik Muchhala waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents. With the consent of learned advocates on both the sides, the matter is heard finally.

2. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties, the petitioners, original accused in Criminal Case No. 59569 of 2018, has prayed to quash and set aside the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Court of learned VIIth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and Additional Senior Civil Judge, Surat dated 12.2.2020 and the warrant issued thereon dated 28.06.2021, whereby the petitioners - original accused came to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, "the NI Act") and to pay a fine of Rs.3,25,000/-. In default of payment of said fine amount, the petitioners have been sentenced to undergo SI for 6 months and out of the said

R/SCR.A/7466/2021 ORDER DATED: 03/09/2021

amount, the petitioners shall pay Rs,3,25,000/- to the complainant as compensation as provided under Section 357 of Cr.PC.

3. The respondent-complainant, who has been identified by learned advocate Mr. Hardik Muchhala, appeared before the Court and stated that he has received the entire amount, as has been directed by the Court below in the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence.

4. The affidavit of Mr. Anand Gopidas Daga, Business - Director of Aumgene Bio Sciences Private Limited- respondent No.2 herein is placed on record. According to his affidavit, Rs. 3,25,000/- as per order of the Hon'ble Trial Court below by way of Demand Draft is received by the respondent No.2 from the petitioners herein and has further stated that he has no objection if the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 59569 of 2018 along with the judgment of conviction dated 12.2.2020 and warrant dated 28.6.2021 and all the subsequent proceedings are quashed and set aside by the High Court.

5. Today, Mr. Ravindra Natthu Bagul, Accountant (authorised person) is before this Court and he states that he has been authorised to give consent as well as no objection in the proceedings of Special Criminal Application No. 7466 of 2021 for quashing and setting aside the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 59569 of 2018 along with judgment of conviction dated 12.2.2020, warrant dated 28.6.2021 and all the subsequent proceedings arising thereof. Certified True Copy of the

R/SCR.A/7466/2021 ORDER DATED: 03/09/2021

Resolution passed at the meeting of Board of Directors of Aumgene Bio Sciences Private Limited on 2 nd Day of September, 2021 is placed on record.

6. Learned advocate Mr. Rajesh Sahjani appearing for the petitioners - accused, therefore, submitted that the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence as well as the warrant and all the subsequent proceedings arising thereof may be quashed and set aside on the ground of settlement between the parties.

7. Heard learned advocates on both the sides. Section 147 of the NI Act deals with "Offences to be compoundable". It was inserted by Act 55 of 2002 with effect from 06.02.2003. For ready reference, Section 147 is reproduced hereunder:-

"147. Offences to be compoundable. - Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), every offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable."

8. It would be apt to clarify that in view of the non-obstante clause, the compounding of offences under the NI Act is controlled by Section 147 and the scheme contemplated by Section 320 of Cr.P.C. will not be applicable in the strict sense since the latter is meant for the specified offences under the IPC. So far as the Cr.P.C. concerned, Section 320 deals with offences which are compoundable, either by the parties without the leave of the court or by the parties but only with the leave of the

R/SCR.A/7466/2021 ORDER DATED: 03/09/2021

Court. Sub-section (1) of Section 320 enumerates the offences which are compoundable without the leave of the Court, while sub- section (2) of the said section specifies the offences which are compoundable with the leave of the Court. Section 147 of the NI Act is in the nature of an enabling provision which provides for the compounding of offences prescribed under the same Act, thereby serving as an exception to the general rule incorporated in sub-section (9) of Section 320 of Cr.P.C. which states that "No offence shall be compounded except as provided by this Section". A bare reading of this provision would lead us to the inference that offences punishable under laws other than the IPC also cannot be compounded. However, since Section 147 was inserted by way of an amendment to a special law, the same will override the effect of Section 320(a) of the Cr.P.C. especially keeping in mind that Section 147 carries a non- obstante clause.

9. In Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., AIR 2010 SC 1907, the Apex Court held that Section 147 of the NI Act is in the nature of an enabling provision and served as an exception to the general rule incorporated in sub-section (a) of Section 320 of Cr.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the principle rendered in Damodar S. Prabhus's case (supra), the offence in question could be compounded.

10. In the result, the petition is allowed. The impugned judgment and order of conviction passed by the Court of learned VIIth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and Additional Senior Civil Judge, Surat, in Criminal Case No. 59569 of 2018 dated 12.2.2020, and the warrant issued thereon dated 28.06.2021, and

R/SCR.A/7466/2021 ORDER DATED: 03/09/2021

all the subsequent proceedings arising thereof is quashed and set aside qua the present petitioners, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Rule is made absolute. Direct service permitted.

(GITA GOPI,J) SAJ GEORGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter