Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hirabhai Danabhai Chamar vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 16675 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16675 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Hirabhai Danabhai Chamar vs State Of Gujarat on 25 October, 2021
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
     C/SCA/11759/2021                            ORDER DATED: 25/10/2021




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11759 of 2021

==========================================================
                        HIRABHAI DANABHAI CHAMAR
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GAURAV K MEHTA(5227) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3
MS SURBHI BHATI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                             Date : 25/10/2021

                              ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Gaurav K. Mehta for the petitioners and learned AGP Ms. Surbhi Bhati for the respondent-State.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.

3. By way of this petition, the petitioners inter alia seek grant of benefit of payment of salary in minimum of pay scale.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners would submit that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court (Coram : Mohinder Pal, J) vide judgment dated 21.12.2018 in Special Civil Application No. 7463 of 2012 and allied cases had been

C/SCA/11759/2021 ORDER DATED: 25/10/2021

pleased to inter alia hold that part-time employees, ad- hoc employees, casual labourers etc. would be entitled to draw wages in minimum of the pay scale i.e. at the lowest grade in the regular pay scale extended to the regular employees holding the same post. Learned Advocate would submit that the said decision of the Co-ordinate Bench has been confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court (Coram : Anant Dave, ACJ and Biren Vaishnav, J) vide judgment dated 19.05.2019 in Letters Patent Appeal No.1155 of 2019 and allied matters. Learned Advocate would further submit that based upon the decisions of this Court referred to herein above, the State Government has come out with a policy decision vide Circular dated 16.07.2019 of giving salary in minimum of pay scale to temporary employees. Learned Advocate would further submit that as per the Circular dated 16.07.2019, the benefit of payment of salary in minimum of pay scale would be available to the part-time employees with effect from 01.01.2019, if the concerned employee was in service on 01.01.2019.

5. As against the same, learned AGP could not point out about the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench, confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench being interfered with by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Learned AGP also could not contradict the fact of Circular dated 16.07.2019 being in force as on date. Learned AGP would submit that whether the benefit of decisions of this Court as well as

C/SCA/11759/2021 ORDER DATED: 25/10/2021

policy of the State Government being applicable to the petitioner or not may be left to the respondent authorities to decide.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned Advocates for the parties, this Court proposes to dispose of the present petition with the following directions :

(A) The respondent - District Collector, Panchmahal, in whose office (Revenue Department) the petitioners are working at present shall within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of this order forward a proposal to the parent department i.e. Revenue Department, State of Gujarat. The proposal would be recommending the case of the petitioners for being paid salary in minimum of pay scale if the petitioners are entitled to the same after appropriate examination by the department. In case the office/department where the petitioners are working is of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled for benefit of Circular dated 16.07.2019, then the petitioners shall be informed accordingly in writing.

(B) The parent department being Revenue Department, State of Gujarat, shall examine the proposal sent to it, more particularly as regards

C/SCA/11759/2021 ORDER DATED: 25/10/2021

the entitlement of the present petitioners to the benefit of Circular dated 16.07.2019 and whereas if the petitioners are found entitled to the same, then the said proposal shall be forwarded to the Finance Department, State of Gujarat, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal. In case the parent department is of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to the said benefit, the same shall be informed to the petitioners in writing.

(C) The Finance Department, State of Gujarat upon receipt of the proposal shall examine the same as regards the entitlement of the petitioners to the benefit of Circular dated 16.07.2019 and shall pass appropriate orders for payment of arrears and payment of salary regularly in minimum of pay scale.

7. The respondent authorities shall do well to appreciate that as such having taken a policy decision vide Circular dated 16.07.2019, it was incumbent upon the State Government and its concerned departments to have suo-motu done the exercise of identifying persons who are entitled to the benefit of Circular dated 16.07.2019 and to make appropriate payments in their favour. Having not done so and the petitioners being

C/SCA/11759/2021 ORDER DATED: 25/10/2021

required to approach this Court for redressal of their grievance, therefore it is clarified that the time set out by this Court as stipulated herein above is the outer most time limit and whereas each of the departments shall strictly abide by the time limit and whereas the proposals or final order, as the case may be, shall be forwarded or passed within the period stipulated herein above without fail.

8. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the aspect of whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Circular dated 16.07.2019 and whereas the concerned respondents shall take appropriate decision in accordance with law. It is further clarified that in case the petitioners were to be aggrieved with the decision of any of the concerned respondents, then it would be open for the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy as available to them under the law.

9. With the above limited observations and directions, the present petition is disposed of as allowed. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) V.V.P. PODUVAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter