Sandip Arvindbhai Bariya vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 9920 Guj

   R/SCR.A/1906/2020                                IA ORDER DATED: 29/07/2021




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


   CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULARIZATION OF LATE
                   SURRENDER) NO. 1 of 2021
       In R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1906 of 2020
==========================================================

SANDIP ARVINDBHAI BARIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance:

for the PETITIONER(s) No. THROUGH JAIL for the PETITIONER(s) No. MR HK PATEL, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA

Date : 29/07/2021

IA ORDER

Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP for the respondent-State waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.

By way of present application submitted through Jail, the applicant has prayed to regularize the default committed by him in complying with the order of Parole Leave granted by this Court in Special Criminal Application No. 1906 of 2020 for 10 days for preferring an appeal against his conviction order, as he surrendered before the Jail Authorities 04 days beyond the period fixed by this courtand according to him, due to prevailing situation of Covid-19, he could not surrender in time, and for such default, he preferred the application before

R/SCR.A/1906/2020 IA ORDER DATED: 29/07/2021

the competent authority to regularize his late surrender, which is still pending. and therefore, he has prayed for condonation of the aforesaid delay.

As the application was forwarded through jail, this Court has heard learned APP for the Respondent-State.

Learned APP for the respondent-State has referred Section 48A of the Prisons Act and Rule 1287 of the Gujarat Jail Manual and submitted that if any prisoner fails without sufficient cause to observe any of the conditions on which his sentence was suspended, remitted or furlough or parole was granted to him, he shall be deemed to have committed a prison offence and the Superintendent may, after obtaining his explanation, punish such offence as provided under Section 48A of the Prisons Act. He has also referred Rule 1287 of the Gujarat Jail Manual and submitted that it is left to the discretion of the Superintendent to decide whether he was prevented by sufficient cause from surrendering within time. He has further submitted that the parole leave was granted to the present applicant by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, but however, now, this Court Court may not exercise any powers to set aside the subsequent punishment imposed under the Jail Manual nor can it regularize the default committed by the applicant after the imposition of punishment. In support of his arguments, learned APP for the respondent-State has placed

R/SCR.A/1906/2020 IA ORDER DATED: 29/07/2021

reliance on the judgment of Division Bench of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. application No. 1360 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 2884 of 2008 and requested to dismiss present application.

Having gone through the facts of the application submitted by the applicant, jail remarks dated 20.07.2021 forwarded by Deputy Superintendent, Vadodara Central Jail, Vadodara and having heard learned APP for the respondent- State, it appears that admittedly the applicant has committed breach of condition in which, he was released on parole leave by competent authority. Thereafter, he was surrendered late by 04 days. The authorities have resorted to the provisions of Punishment provided in the Gujarat Jail Manual. It appears from the above provision that it is within the province of the Superintendent to decide whether the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from surrendering within the time. The Jail Authorities having exercised their discretion, it is now for the applicant to challenge such action by filing appropriate writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before this Court. It appears that the coordinate Bench of this Court has granted Parole Leave to the present applicant. In exercise of its appellate jurisdiction conferred under the Code of Criminal Procedure, this Court may not exercise the power to set aside the subsequent punishment imposed under the Jail

R/SCR.A/1906/2020 IA ORDER DATED: 29/07/2021

Manual nor can it regularize the default committed by the applicant after the imposition of punishment as held by the Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1360 OF 2014 IN Criminal Appeal NO. 2884 of 2008. In the said judgment, the learned Division Bench has held in para 4 and 5 as under:

4. In order to appreciate the question, the provisions of Section 48A of the Prisons Act and Rule 1287 of the Gujarat Jail Manual are relevant, which are quoted below:

48A of the Prisons Act "48.A: Punishment for breach of conditions of suspension or remission of sentence or of grant of furlough or release on parole:

If any prisoner fails without sufficient cause to observe any of the conditions on which his sentence was suspended, remitted or furlough or parole was granted to him, he shall be deemed to have committed a prison offence and the Superintendent may, after obtaining his explanation, punish such offence by -

(1). a formal warning as provided in clause (1) of section 46; (2). reduction in grade if such prisoner has been appointed an officer of prison;

(3). loss of privileges admissible under the remission or furlough system; or (4). loss of such other privileges as the State Government may by a general or special order direct." 1287 of the Gujarat Jail Manual.

"1287. In each case of late surrender or breach of any of the conditions of furlough or parole, the necessary punishment or punishments should be awarded by the Superintendent of Prison with due regard to the circumstances of each case. All the punishments mentioned below or in Section 48-Aof the Prisons Act, 1894 need not necessarily be awarded in each case but it is left to the discretion of the Superintendent to decide which particular punishment or punishments should be awarded. If in certain cases, the Superintendent is satisfied that

R/SCR.A/1906/2020 IA ORDER DATED: 29/07/2021

the overstayal was for good or sufficient reasons, he may excuse the prisoner. However, before awarding any punishment, the Superintendent should invariably obtain a prisoner's explanation in each case of overstayal of period or breach of any conditions of furlough or parole.

[1] A maximum cut of 5 days' remission for each day of overstay;

Provided that where the prisoner has not sufficient remission to his credit, he shall cease to earn remission in future for such period as the Superintendent may direct;

[2] Stoppage of canteen concession for a period of not less than one month and not more than three months.

[3] Withholding concession of either interviews or letters or both, for a maximum period of three months.

[4] In cases of furlough, the furlough period not to be counted towards sentence."

5. A plain reading of the aforesaid provisions makes it abundantly clear that if any person fails to observe any of the conditions on which his sentence was suspended or remitted or furlough or parole was granted to him, he should be deemed to have committed a prison offence and the Superintendent may, after obtaining his explanation, punish such offence as provided therein.

Considering the facts of the case and contents of the application as well as having heard learned APP for the respondent-State, it is made clear that this Court has not otherwise gone into the question whether in the facts of the present case, the applicant is entitled for condonation of delay in surrendering before the jail authority and it is for the appropriate authority to decide such questions in accordance

R/SCR.A/1906/2020 IA ORDER DATED: 29/07/2021

with law if the applicant is approached before such authority.

Accordingly, present application stands dismissed. The dismissal of this application will not stand in the way of the applicant in approaching the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

Rule stands discharged.

(B.N. KARIA, J) K. S. DARJI