Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Desai Bharatbhai Nagjibhai vs Khokhar Mahmadbhai Yarmahmad
2021 Latest Caselaw 3548 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3548 Guj
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Desai Bharatbhai Nagjibhai vs Khokhar Mahmadbhai Yarmahmad on 26 February, 2021
Bench: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
        C/FA/18831/2019                                     IA ORDER




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2 of
                           2021
            In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 18831 of 2019
==========================================================

DESAI BHARATBHAI NAGJIBHAI Versus KHOKHAR MAHMADBHAI YARMAHMAD ========================================================== Appearance:

MR KAMLESH S KOTAI for the PETITIONER(s) No. for the RESPONDENT(s) No. ==========================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI

Date : 26/02/2021

IA ORDER

Heard learned advocate Mr. Kamlesh Kotai for the applicant.

Rule.

By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed for condone the delay of 179 days in filing the present civil application for delay in restoring the First Appeal (Filing) No. 18831 of 2019.

Learned advocate for the applicant has stated that the impugned judgment and award was passed by the learned Tribunal on 12.03.2019. He has further stated that the main First Appeal was listed before the Hon'ble Court (Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Bhargav Karia) for removal of office objections on 09.07.2019. The Hon'ble Court was pleased to permit the applicant to remove the office objections on or before 19.08.2019, failing which the First Appeal would stand dismissed for non- prosecution. Learned advocate for the applicant has stated that the office

C/FA/18831/2019 IA ORDER

objections could not be removed within the prescribed time limit and the matter was dismissed for non-prosecution at admission stage. It is further stated by learned advocate for the applicant that the applicant is a poor and there were certain office objections with regards to translation and supply certain documents properly but the applicant could not comply with the same and therefore, the appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution. Learned advocate for the applicant has stated that since there was lockdown across the country due to global pandemic because of Corona Virus, the applicant was unable to remove office objections within stipulated time and the first appeal was dismissed for non prosecution. The explanation rendered by the learned advocate for the applicant requires consideration.

Accordingly, the delay of 179 days occurred in filing the civil application for delay in restoring the Misc. Civil Application is required to be condoned and the same is hereby condoned. The Civil Application is allowed to the aforesaid extent. Rule is made absolute.

(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) VARSHA DESAI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter