Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/5 vs The State Of Assam
2026 Latest Caselaw 1564 Gua

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1564 Gua
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/5 vs The State Of Assam on 23 February, 2026

                                                                     Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010035412026




                                                              undefined

                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : Bail Appln./530/2026

          ALAL UDDIN AND 3 ORS.
          S/O LT SAFIR UDDIN, R/O VILL SONAIBERA GAON, PS JURIA, DIST
          NAGAON, ASSAM

          2: FAKAR UDDIN ALIAS FAKAR UDDIN ALI AHMED
           S/O LT SAFIR UDDIN
           R/O VILL SONAIBERA GAON
           PS JURIA
           DIST NAGAON
          ASSAM

          3: AFAJ UDDIN
           S/O LT SAFIR UDDIN
           R/O VILL SONAIBERA GAON
           PS JURIA
           DIST NAGAON
          ASSAM

          4: JAMIR UDDIN
           S/O LT SAFIR UDDIN
           R/O VILL SONAIBERA GAON
           PS JURIA
           DIST NAGAON
          ASSA

          VERSUS

          THE STATE OF ASSAM
          TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM



Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ, MD A RAHMAN,A MISHRA,SAMIM
RAHMAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS
                                                                       Page No.# 2/5


Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,




                                  BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

                                           ORDER

Date : --23.02.2026

Heard Mr. S. Nawaz, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for bail to the accused/petitioners, who have been arrested on 12.02.2026 in connection with Juria Police Station Case No. 21/2026, registered under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of BNS, 2023.

3. It is submitted by Mr. Nawaz, the learned counsel for the petitioners that one FIR has been initially lodged by one Mizanur Rahman alleging that one accused namely Junaid Ahmed along with two unknown persons came to the resident of his niece Semim Akhtar on 10.01.2026 and they tried to drag the victim girl Semim Akhtar and when his uncle namely, Jiyabur Rahman raised objection they dragged him into an auto rickshaw, hit him on his head and fled away by throwing the said victim from their auto and subsequently he died out of the said incident. Initially a case was registered u/s 109 BNSS and subsequently out of his death, on the prayer made by the I/O, the case is registered u/s 103 IPC. The earlier FIR was lodged on 11.01.2026 immediately after the date of incident on 10.01.2026. But, subsequently another FIR was lodged by the wife of the deceased alleging that 6 nos. of accused/persons were found near the injured i.e. her husband. But, subsequently he was referred to Page No.# 3/5

Rahman Medical Hospital and subsequently he died. But the said FIR was lodged only on 19.01.2026 i.e. after 9 days of the said occurrence. Both the FIRs are being now registered u/s 103 IPC and all the present accused/petitioners are arrested on the basis of the subsequent FIR which is lodged by the wife of the deceased.

4. Mr. Nawaz further submitted that there is no mention about commitment of murder against the present petitioners and except it is mentioned that some of the accused/persons were seen near the injured, who was lying on the ground. However, the present petitioners got arrested in connection with the case on 12.02.2026 at about one month later of the incident. But, while notice was issued against all the petitioners u/s 47 & 48 BNSS along with the Arrest Memo there is no ground mentioned for their arrest. Further, there is not even mention about the death of the person for whom they got arrested in a case which is registered u/s 103 IPC. It is submitted that all the certified copy of the notices have been furnished along with the petition. Mr. Nawaz accordingly submitted that till the receipt of the Case Diary the present petitioners are entitled to bail as there is total non-compliance of Sections 47 & 48 BNSS, which is in violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India.

5. Mr. Borthakur, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that only on perusal of the record it cannot be said that there is no involvement of the present petitioners in the alleged offence. However, he submitted that it seems that out of the same incident the second/subsequent FIR has been lodged, which may be treated as a subsequent FIR or u/s 162 Cr.PC. But, at this stage without perusal of the Case Diary it cannot not be said about the involvement of this case.

Page No.# 4/5

6. After hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides, it is seen that out of the same incident two FIRs have been lodged and admittedly one person died for the assault. But, in one FIR it is the allegation brought against one Junaid Ahmed along with two others but, in the subsequent FIR it is alleged that the present petitioners along with some others were found near the injured when the deceased was lying in injured condition near the house of one Malik. Further, it is seen that admittedly there is no ground of arrest mentioned in the notice u/s 47 & 48 BNSS, not even there is whisper about the death of any any person. However, without perusal of the Case Diary it cannot be said as to whether there is any other compliance of Section 47/48 BNSS. However, considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners may be released on interim bail, till receipt of the Case Diary.

7. Accordingly, it is provided that on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nagaon the accused/petitioners, namely [1] Alal Uddin [2] Fakar Uddin @ Fakar Uddin Ali Ahmed [3] Afaj Uddin and [4] Jamar Uddin, be enlarged on interim bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioners will report before the concerned police station every fortnight and will extend their cooperation with the investigation;

(ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and Page No.# 5/5

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned CJM, Nagaon without prior permission.

8. List the matter on 12.03.2026 with Case Diary.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter