Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3318 Gua
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2026
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010071942026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2051/2026
RASHIDUL ISLAM
S/O NOIMUDDIN SHEIKH, S.K, BORORAVATARY, PT. II, P.O- RAVATARI,
DISTRICT- DHUBRI (ASSAM), PIN- 783127
VERSUS
BANDHAN BANK AND 2 ORS
REGIONAL OFFICE, REPRESENTED BY THE VICE PRESIDENT, AG TOWER,
SURVEY, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI- 28, ASSAM
2:BRANCH MANAGER
BANDHAN BANK
DHUBRI BRANCH
CR DAS ROAD
NEAR HARI SABHA PARA
ZIA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX
DHUBRI
ASSAM
3:THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (MHA)
NORTH BLOCK
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NEWE DELH
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Ali, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Roy, CGC
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 08.04.2026
Issue notice making it returnable on 29.04.2026.
2. Mr. S.S. Roy, the learned CGC appears on behalf of the respondent No. 3 and accepts notice.
3. Extra copies of the writ petition be served upon him during the course of the day.
4. As regards the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the petitioner is directed to take steps by way of Speed Post within 3 (three) days.
5. The petitioner is further granted the liberty to take steps upon the respondent No. 2 by way of Dasti routed through the Registry of this Court and file an affidavit of service on or before the next date.
6. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the actions on the part of the respondent No. 2 in freezing the petitioner's bank account maintained with the respondent No. 1 Bank, Dhubri Branch. The savings bank account number of the petitioner is 20200064620353.
7. It is the case of the petitioner that the Station House Officer, Page No.# 3/3
Uttar Pradesh, Ballia Bansdeeh had sent information to the respondent No. 2 informing that an amount of Rs. 29,224/- was proceeds of cybercrime and immediately thereupon the petitioner's bank account was frozen. It is the further case of the petitioner that the said amount of Rs. 29,224/- has already been deducted from the petitioner's account, but till date the petitioner has not been permitted to operate the said bank account. It is under such circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
8. The respondents herein, more particularly the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, are directed to apprise this Court, by way of instructions, as to why the petitioner's bank account should not be allowed to be made operational on the next date.
9. List accordingly.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!