Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 7565 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7565 Gua
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2025

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/4 vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 22 September, 2025

Author: Devashis Baruah
Bench: Devashis Baruah
                                                                       Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010188682025




                                                             2025:GAU-AS:13122

                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : WP(C)/5559/2025

         HALIMA NESSA @ HALIMAN BEGUM @ HALIMAN BEWA
         W/O LATE JAMAL, D/O LATE SABED ALI, R/O VILL- SHAPUR, P.O.-
         SORBHOG, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781317



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,
         GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110001

         2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
          HOME DEPARTMENT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI
          PIN-781006

         3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
          REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION
          NIRVACHAN SADAN
         ASHOKA ROAD
          NEW DELHI-110001

         4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
          BARPETA
          P.O. AND P.S.- BARPETA
          DIST- BARPETA
         ASSAM
          PIN-781301

         5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
          BARPETA
                                                               Page No.# 2/4

         P.O. AND P.S.- BARPETA
         DIST- BARPETA
         ASSAM
         PIN-78130

For the petitioner (s) : Ms. D. Ghosh, Advocate

  For the respondent (s) : Mr. J. Payeng, Advocate
                      Mr. A. I. Ali, SC, ECI


                                  BEFORE
         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

                     Date of Hearing       : 22.09.2025

                     Date of Judgment      : 22.09.2025
                       JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Ms. D. Ghosh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. J. Payeng, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 & 5 and Mr. A. I. Ali, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.3

2. The case of the petitioner herein is that in the voters list of 1997, the name of the petitioner was marked with the letter "D" and thereupon the petitioner has approached the concerned respondent authorities for removal of the tag "D" in her name from the voters list. As the concerned respondent authorities had failed to do so, the petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for an appropriate direction that Page No.# 3/4

the letter "D" tagged with the name of the petitioner in the voters list be removed.

3. Whether a person is a "D" voter or not is a matter of factual determination and the appropriate forum to do the same is the concerned Foreigners Tribunal. This Court in exercise of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not have the competence to decide such a question which depends on the evidence that may be produced.

4. In the circumstances, this Court therefore directs the respondent No.5 i.e., the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, Assam to verify as to whether the petitioner has already been referred to the concerned Foreigners Tribunal, and if upon verification it is found that the petitioner has not been referred to the concerned Foreigners Tribunal, this Court further directs the said respondent No.5 to refer the case of the petitioner as regards the mark "D" in the voters list in respect to 40 No. Sorbhog LAC, Barpeta to a competent Foreigners Tribunal, Barpeta district for an appropriate adjudication as regards the status of the petitioner as "D" voter in the concerned voters list.

5. Reference be made within a period of 2 (two) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Upon such reference being made, the petitioner may participate in such Page No.# 4/4

proceedings and establish her case.

6. If the case of the petitioner as per the records had already been referred to the relevant Foreigners Tribunal, there would be no requirement to make any further reference and the detailed information of the earlier reference be communicated to the petitioner.

7. With the above directions and observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter