Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7959 Gua
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010057822024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1590/2024
AJAY KUMAR HANDIQUE @ AJAY KR HANDIQUE
SON OF DINA NATH HANDIQUE, RESIDENT OF AZARA JIGORIPARA VIP
NEAR ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, PIN- 781015,
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE HOME AND
POLITICAL DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
6, ASSAM
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HOME (A) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
ASSAM
3:INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 07
4:DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-7
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I RAFIQUE, MS. R. R. SAIKIA,MRS S A CHOUDHURY,MS A
AFREEN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3
Linked Case : WP(C)/4819/2024
AJAY KUMAR HANDIQUE @ AJAY KR HANDIQUE
S/O DINA NATH HANDIQUE
RESIDENT OF AZARA JIGORIPARA VIP NEAR ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE
DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781015
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF HOME
AND POLITICAL DEPT. GOVT. OF ASSAM. DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 ASSAM
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOME (A) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 006
ASSAM
3:INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM 07
4:DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
GOVT. OF ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 07
ASSAM CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
------------
Advocate for : MR I RAFIQUE
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
Page No.# 3/3
23.10.2025 Heard Mr. I Rafique, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate for the State.
The writ petition being W.P(C) No. 4819/2024 is filed by the petitioner putting a challenge to the order dated 06.09.2024 whereby the respondent authorities initiated a de novo enquiry against the writ petitioner.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the Judgments rendered by this Court, de novo enquiry is not permitted except to make corrections if required. The further submission is that the enquiry which was earlier conducted, copy of the enquiry report was never serviced on the writ petitioner.
The respondents have contested the matter by filing an affidavit. However, the enquiry report is not enclosed to the affidavit.
Therefore, it would be necessary for deciding the issue raised to call for the relevant records.
Let the records of the case be called for which must include the disciplinary proceedings initiated earlier including the enquiry report submitted by the earlier enquiry officer.
The writ petition being W.P(C) No. 1590/2024 is also filed by the petitioner challenging his suspension.
List both these matters again on 13.11.2025.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!