Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4348 Gua
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010119582022
2024:GAU-AS:5203
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4102/2022
MD. MATIBUR RAHMAN
S/O- LATE MUSLIM UDDIN OF VILL- DAKHIN KALADUBA, P.S. JURIA,
DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM. PIN- 782124.
VERSUS
MD. NABI HUSSAIN AND 4 ORS
S/O- LATE SAMSUDDIN, R/O- UTTAR KALADUBA, P.S. JURIA, DISTRICT-
NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782124.
2:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-RETURNING OFFICER
NAGAON
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM.
3:DULAL DEBNATH
ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
CUM- IN- CHARGE
PANCHAYAT ELECTION
OF 55 NO. JENGONI
KALADUBA GAON PANCHAYAT
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM.
4:TAHARUN NESSA
W/O- IKRAMUL HUSSAIN
VILL. JENGONI
MOUZA- ALITANGONI
P/S- DHING
DIST.- NAGAON
ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3
5:MUSTAKIM ALOM
S/O- ABDUL MUNNAF
R/O- DAKHIN KALADUBA
MOUZA- ALITANGONI
P/S- JURIA
DIST.- NAGAON
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, MS. L WAJEEDA,MR. N
ISLAM,MR. M H SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. A Y CHOUDHURY (R-5),MR. T A
CHOUDHURY (R-5),MS S Z HAYAT (R-4),FOR CAVEATOR,M ALOM,MR. A AHMED,MR K U
AHMED,MRS. S Y AHMED,MR. M K HUSSAIN
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
21-03-2025
1. By filing this writ petition, the judgment and order dated 04.06.2022 passed by the District Judge-cum-Chairman, Panchayat Election Tribunal, Nagaon in connection with Election Petition No. 01(N)/2019, has been put to challenge, inter alia, on the ground that the findings and conclusions arrived at by the learned Tribunal are perverse in the eye of law.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the tenure of the aforesaid Panchayat, has, in the meantime, expired in the month of December, 2023.
3. Be that as it may, due to continuous non-representation of the petitioner, by order dated 03.06.2024, the matter was dismissed for non-prosecution. However, considering that on that day, i.e., on 03.06.2024, there was unprecedented heavy rain, therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not appear before the Court, by order dated Page No.# 3/3
17.09.2024, the writ petition was restored. Subsequently, the petitioner was asked to correct the cause title, in view of the change in situation. However, Office Note dated 11.03.2025 discloses that the petitioner has not submitted any amended cause title.
4. None appears for the petitioner on call today, though the names of four counsels for
him have been reflected in the cause list.
5. Considering the aforesaid, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!