Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3596 Gua
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2025
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010035702025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/17/2025
RABINDRA NATH ROY
S/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY,
RESIDENT OF JHASKAL PART II, PS AGOMONI, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM
2: BADAL NATH ROY
S/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY
RESIDENT OF JHASKAL PART II
PS AGOMONI
DIST DHUBRI
ASSAM
3: BIDHAN CHANDRA ROY
S/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY
RESIDENT OF JHASKAL PART II
PS AGOMONI
DIST DHUBRI
ASSAM
4: BINOD KUMAR ROY
S/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY
RESIDENT OF JHASKAL PART II
PS AGOMONI
DIST DHUBRI
ASSA
VERSUS
SMTI ALOKA SARKAR,
D/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY,
W/O KAMINI KANTA SARKAR
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JHAPUSABARI PART III, PO JHAPUNSABARI, PS
Page No.# 2/4
AGOMONI, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM 783335
2:SMTI SURO BALA ROY
W/O PRAFULLYA CHANDRA ROY
D/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHERBARI PART I
PO KHERBARI
PS AGOMONI
DIST DHUBRI
ASSAM 783335
3:BHUPAL CHANDRA ROY L. P SCHOOL
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
VILLAGE JHASKAL PART II
PS AGOMONI
DIST DHUBRI
ASSAM 78335
4:THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
DHUBRI
ASSAM 783301
5:SMTI ANITA BALA ROY
D/O LATE DHARANI KANTA ROY
W/O LATE RABINDRA NATH PRODHANI
VILLAGE BISONDOI PART II
PO BISONDOI
PS GOLAKGANJ
DIST DHUBRI
ASSAM 78312
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A HAWARI, A R MONDAL,MR. S ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER
28.02.2025
Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the appellants.
This appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the impugned Judgment dated 20.11.2024, passed by the learned District Judge, Dhubri, in Title Appeal No. 10/2019, which set aside the Judgment & Decree dated 26.07.2019, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Dhubri, in Title Suit No. 02/2014.
Upon hearing the learned counsel for the appellants, this appeal is admitted in the following Substantial Questions of Law:-
"i. Whether the learned Lower Appellate Court justified in passing the Impugned Judgment & Decree without confirming the total ancestral properties of the parties?
ii. Whether the learned Lower Appellate Court justified in passing the Impugned Judgment & Decree in a proceeding of non-joinder of necessary parties?
iii. Whether the Ld. Lower Appellate Court justified in passing the Impugned Judgment & Decree by ignoring the evidence of DW-3 (Sister)?
Any other substantial question of law, those may be formulated at the time of hearing.
Page No.# 4/4
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within 6(six) weeks.
The learned counsel for the appellants shall take steps for service of notice upon respondent Nos. 1 to 5 by registered post with A/D as well as through usual process, within a 7(seven) days from today.
List the matters after 6 (six) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!