Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3379 Gua
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2025
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC010017142020
2025:GAU-AS:1952
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP(IO)/41/2020
ABDUL MAZID AND 16 ORS.
S/O LT. MAFIZUDDIN SHEIKH, MUSLIM BY RELIGION, CULTIVATOR BY
OCCUPATION, VILL. NO. 1, BARGARAKHUTI, MOUZA-PUB DALGAON, P.S.
DALGAON, DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
2: IDIRAN BEWA
W/O LT. NUR MAHAMMED
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
3: KUDDUS ALI
S/O LT. NUR MAHAMMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
4: FATEMA KHATUN
W/O ABDULLAH
D/O LT. NUR MAHAMMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
Page No.# 2/6
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
5: HAJERA KHATUN (DUMB)
D/O LT. NUR MAHAMMAD
TO BE REP. BY IDIRAN BEWA
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
6: SAHARA KHATUN
W/O JABAN ALI
D/O LT. NUR MAHAMMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
7: GOLAP ALI @ GOLAP MAHARUDDIN
S/O LT. ABDUL HYE
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
8: AJIRAN NESSA
W/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
9: NAJIBAR RAHMAN
S/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
Page No.# 3/6
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
10: SAHED ALI
S/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
11: SAHIDUL ISLAM
S/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
12: JAINAL ALI
S/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
13: MAJEDA KHATUN
D/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
14: RAHELA NESSA
D/O LT. ABDUL SAMAD
Page No.# 4/6
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
15: JINNAT ALI
S/O LT. ABDUL HEY
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
16: BACCHU ALI
S/O LT. TALEB ALI
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
17: ALI AKBAR
S/O LT. TALEB ALI
MUSLIM BY RELIGION
CULTIVATOR BY OCCUPATION
VILL. NO. 1
BARGARAKHUTI
MOUZA-PUB DALGAON
P.S. DALGAON
DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM
VERSUS
MAHARUDDIN
S/O LT. MONAZUDDIN SHEIKH, MUSLIM BY RELIGION, CULTIVATOR BY
OCCUPATION, VILL. NO. 1, BARGARAKHUTI, MOUZA-PUB DALGAON, P.S.
DALGAON, DIST. DARRANG (ASSAM)
Page No.# 5/6
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. Goswami, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate
Ms. R. Dhar, Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 21.02.2025
Heard Mr. C. Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. M.K. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. R. Dhar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent.
2. This is an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 03.09.2019 passed in petition No. 95/2018 arising out of Title Suit No. 77/2000 whereby the Court of the learned Civil Judge, Darrang, Mangaldoi (hereinafter referred to as, "the learned Trial Court") had allowed the application seeking amendment of the plaint thereby permitting correction of the Dag No. 131 for P.P. No. 131 in the Schedule to the plaint.
3. Mr. C. Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that when an application is filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, "the Code"), the Court could not have exercised its jurisdiction under Section 152 of the Code for permitting the said correction.
4. This Court has duly taken note of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Pratibha Singh and Another Vs. Shanti Devi Prasad and Another reported in (2003) 2 SCC 330 wherein it is stated that it is not Page No.# 6/6
only the duty of the plaintiff to incorporate the correct details of the immovable property in terms with Order VII Rule 3 of the Code, but it is also incumbent upon the learned Trial Court to see that the description of the immovable property is incorporated, so that at the time of decreeing the suit, there is no difficulty in identification of the suit property. In that regard, the Supreme Court further observed that if there is any defect, the same can also be cured under Section 152 of the Code.
5. Consequently, this Court does not find any ground in the instant application to entertain, more particularly, under the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed.
6. It is seen that this Court had stayed the further proceedings of Title Suit No. 77/2000 pending before the learned Trial Court i.e. the Court of the learned Civil Judge, Darrang, Mangaldoi vide an order dated 12.02.2020. The said stay order is vacated and the parties herein who are duly represented are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 10.03.2025 for further proceedings of Title Suit No. 77/2000.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!