Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2945 Gua
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2025
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010240502024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/5/2025
GAURAV UPADHYAY
S/O LATE SHYAM SUNDAR UPADHYAY,
RESIDENT OF GOVT. QUARTER NO. BII,
AT ASSAM POLICE HOUSING COMPLEX,
ULUBARI, DIST KAMRUPM ASSAM 781007.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR ASSAM 781006.
2:DIVYANA A LAHAN
REP. BY HER MOTHER/NEXT FRIEND/LEGAL GUARDIAN
SMT. LEENA DOLEY
PERMANENT R/O- H.NO. 54
BELTOLA COLLEGE ROAD
BANGAON
BELTOLA
GHY-28
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
3:LEENA DOLEY
R/O- H.NO. 54
BELTOLA COLLEGE ROAD
BANGAON
BELTOLA
GHY-28
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
Page No.# 2/4
4:THE SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN)
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
ASSAM.
5:STATE LEVEL CASTE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
ASSAM
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN)
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
ASSAM.
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP M GUWAHATI ASSAM 781001
7:VIGILANCE CELL
DIRECTORATE OF WPT AND BC DEPTT.
GOVT. OF ASSAM
RUKMINI GAON
GHY PIN- 781006
REP. BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CID ASSAM
8:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CID ASSAM ULUBARI GHY-0
For the appellant : Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate
Mr. B. Das, Advocate
For the respondents : Mr. N. Das, Govt. Advocate,
Ms. G. Goswami, Advocate for
Mr. R. Dhar, S.C., Tribal Affairs (Plain) Page No.# 3/4
-BEFORE-
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM 07-02-2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.)
Heard learned senior counsel for the appellant.
Issue notice, returnable on 20.03.2025.
Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate, Assam puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 6, 7 and 8; Ms. G. Goswami, learned counsel puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3; and Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, Tribal Affairs (Plain) puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.4 and 5. Service is therefore complete.
Counsel appearing for the respondents are granted time to file their respective response to the writ appeal, if they desire so, by the next date of hearing.
It is contended that the learned Single Judge vide impugned judgment and order dated 03.10.2024 directed the State Level Scrutiny Committee to decide afresh the validity of the Scheduled Tribe caste certificate issued in favour of the respondent No.2 within a period of 45 days.
It is informed by the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 5 that the said exercise has not been completed till date.
In such circumstances, we restrain the State Level Scrutiny Committee from undertaking the exercise as per the direction given by the learned Single Page No.# 4/4
Judge, till final disposal of this writ appeal.
List this appeal along with WA 388/2022.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!