Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9432 Gua
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010006212017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/92/2018
SRI HALIRAM NATH
S/O LATE SANARAM NATH, R/O VILL. DUNI, MOUZA DIPLIA, P.O. AND P.S.
SIPAJHAR, PIN 784145, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM.
2: MD FOKRUL ISLAM SHAH
S/O LT. KAMAL SHAH VILL- KISMATPUR P.S. and DIST. GOALPARA
ASSAM.
3: MD ZIAUL HAQUE
S/O MD MOHIBUL HAQUE VILL- KISMATPUR
P.O. BALADMARI
P.S. and DIST. GOALPARA
ASSAM
VERSUS
SMTI PAKHILA DEVI and 5 ORS
W/O SRI NARAYAN KALITA, R/O VILL. GOBHARA, MOUZA DIPILA, P.O.
DURI, P.S. SIPAJHAR, PIN 784145, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM.
2:SMTI BIMALA NATH
W/O KAMALA DEKA
R/O WARD NO. 4
MANGALDAI
SANTIPUR
P.O. AND P.S. MANGALDAI
PIN 784125
DIST.
3:SMTI DANDUKA NATH
W/O LATE NARENDRA NATH
R/O VILL. BATAMARI
P.O. AND P.S. KALAIGAON
PIN 784525
Page No.# 2/3
DIST. DARRANG
ASSAM.
4:SRI NILA KANTA NATH
S/O LATE TANKESWAR NATH
VILL. BOSACHUBA
P.O. AND P.S. SIPAJHAR
DIST. DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN 784145
5:SRI PRAFULLA NATH
S/O LATE TANKESWAR NATH
VIL. BOSACHUBA
P.O. AND SIPAJHAR
DIST. DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN 784145
6:BASANTA NATH
S/O LATE TANKESWAR NATH
VILL. BOSACHUBA
P.O. AND P.S. SIPAJHAR
DIST. DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN 78414
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SATTAR, MR Z MUKIT,MR H K BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SARMA (R1-R3), MR. M K SHARMA (R5),MR. L GOGOI
(R-5),MR. ABU JAHID (R1-R3)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
13.12.2025 Parties are present along with their learned counsel.
This second appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2017 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge (FTC), Darrang, Mangaldoi in Title Appeal No. 3/2015.
Page No.# 3/3
The appellant was the defendant in the suit which was initially dismissed. However, in the first appeal preferred by the plaintiffs, the same was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs and the present second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court.
The parties present before this Court have expressed that the dispute being a family dispute has been amicably settled and they do not have any existing grievances.
In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of.
A copy of the memorandum of settlement has also been placed before this Court which is made a part of the records.
Send back the TCR.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!