Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4715 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2025
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010120442025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/590/2025
ARPITA BANIK
W/O SRI PANKAJ GHOSH D/O SRI SWAPAN KUMAR BANIK R/O HOUSE
NO.18, MADAN MOHAN PARK LANE, P.S. RAGIRKHARI P.O.RANGIRKHARI,
DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788005
VERSUS
PANKAJ GHOSH
S/O MANINDRA GHOSH R/O HOUSE NO. 34, WARD NO. 5,
NARSHINGPARA,RONGPUR, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM PIN-788009
2:MANINDRA GHOSH
S/O UNKNOWN
R/O HOUSE NO. 34
WARD NO. 5
NARSHINGPARA
RONGPUR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788009
3:RATNA GHOSH
W/O SRI MANINDRA GHOSH
R/O HOUSE NO. 34
WARD NO. 5
NARSHINGPARA
RONGPUR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-78800
Page No.# 2/4
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I ALAM, MR. T SK
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Linked Case : Crl.Rev.P./176/2025
SMTI ARPITA BANIK
W/O SRI PANKAJ GHOSH
D/O SRI SWAPAN KUMAR BANIK
R/O HOUSE NO.18
MADAN MOHAN PARK LANE
P.S. RAGIRKHARI
P.O.RANGIRKHARI
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788005
VERSUS
PANKANJ GHOSH AND 2 ORS.
S/O MANINDRA GHOSH
R/O HOUSE NO. 34
WARD NO. 5
NARSHINGPARA
RONGPUR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788009
2:MANINDRA GHOSH
S/O UNKNOWN
R/O HOUSE NO. 34
WARD NO. 5
NARSHINGPARA
RONGPUR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788009
3:RATNA GHOSH
W/O SRI MANINDRA GHOSH
Page No.# 3/4
R/O HOUSE NO. 34
WARD NO. 5
NARSHINGPARA
RONGPUR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788009
------------
Advocate for : MR. I ALAM
Advocate for : appearing for PANKANJ GHOSH AND 2 ORS.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 20.08.2025
Heard Mr. T. Sk, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Bhatta, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Insurance Company.
2. This application has been filed praying for correction of the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Rev. P. /176/2025. In the said order, the date of the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar has been inadvertently mentioned as "25.04.2024", whereas the date of the judgment should have been "25.04.2025".
3. Therefore, the error stands corrected.
4. Henceforth, the judgment dated '25.04.2024" appearing in the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Rev. P. /176/2025 shall be read as "25.04.2025".
5. This order shall form a part of the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Rev. P. /176/2025.
Page No.# 4/4
With the aforesaid direction, the IA stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!