Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3254 Gua
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2024
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010125652023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1634/2023
DULAL CHANDRA GHOSH DULAL GHOSH
SON OF RAMESH GHOSH , RESIDENT OF VILLAGE URIAMGURI, TEZPUR,
DIST SONITPUR, ASASM
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF ROAD
TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA, TRANSPORT BHAWAN 1,
PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI 110001
2:NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED(NHIDCL)
A FULLY OWNED COMPANY OFTHE MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT
AND HIGHWAYS
GOVT. OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR
PTI BUILDING
4 PARLIAMENT STREET
NEW DELHI 110001
3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (PROJECT)
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED(NHIDCL)
PROJECT MONITORING UNIT TEZPUR
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SARAF TOWER
1ST FLOOR
OPP. DON BOSCO SCHOOL
MAZGAON
TEZPUR
DIST SONITPUR
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM 784001
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR
SONITPUR
TEZPUR
DIST SONITPUR
ASSAM
784001
5:THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM ADDITIONAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER
LAND ACQUISITION
SONITPUR
DIST SONITPUR
ASSAM
784001
6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
TEZPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
TEZPUR
DIST SONITPUR
ASSAM
784001
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD( BUILDING) SONITPUR
DIST SONITPUR
ASSAM 7840
Linked Case :
DULAL CHANDRA GHOSH DULAL GHOSH
URIAMGURI
TEZPUR
DISTRICT SONITPUR
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF ROAD
TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
GOVERMENT OF INDIA
TRANSPORT BHAWAN
1
PARLIAMENT STREET
NEW DELHI-110001
Page No.# 3/3
For the applicant (s) : Mr. T. Chakraborty, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Mrs. K. Phukan, Govt. Advocate
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
13.05.2024
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay of 84 days in preferring the Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment dated 07.12.2022 passed in Misc.(Arb) No.02/2022 by the learned District Judge, Sonitpur.
2. This Court has duly perused the grounds stated in the said application to explain the delay in preferring the accompanying Appeal. The grounds which have been mentioned in paragraph Nos.15 to 21 in the opinion of this Court constitute a sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 84 days. Accordingly, the delay of 84 days in preferring the accompanying Appeal stands condoned.
3. The accompanying Appeal be registered and listed for admission in the last week of May.
4. In view of the above, the instant Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!