Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Abhijit Auto Agency (I) Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 3248 Gua

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3248 Gua
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2024

Gauhati High Court

M/S Abhijit Auto Agency (I) Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 13 May, 2024

Author: Nelson Sailo

Bench: Nelson Sailo

                                                                 Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010150202022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/4994/2022

            M/S ABHIJIT AUTO AGENCY (I) PVT. LTD.
            A COMPANY DULY REGISTERED IN TERMS OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE
            COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND
            SHOWROOM AT VILL- SORUSAJAI, NEAR SPORTS COMPLEX, NH-37,
            GUWAHATI-781034 AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED
            DIRECTOR, SRI VIJAY KUMAR JASRASARIA S/O LATE CHIRANGILAL
            JASRASARIA



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM,
            AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT,
            KRISHI BHAWAN, G.S. ROAD, KHANAPRA, GUWAHATI-781022, ASSAM

            2:THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
             KRISHI BHAWAN
             G.S. ROAD
             KHANAPARA
             GUWAHATI-781022
            ASSAM

            3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
            AGRICULTURE
             KRISHI BHAWAN
             G.S. ROAD
             KHANAPARA
             GUWAHATI- 781022
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. N ANIX SINGH
                                                                       Page No.# 2/3

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AGRI. DEPARTMENT




                                BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

                                      ORDER

Date : 13-05-2024

Heard Mr. N.A. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. G. Bora, learned counsel who has appeared for all the respondents.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner claims for release of a sum of Rs.6,29,901.00 (Rupees Six Lakhs Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and One) which is due to him for supply of TATA commercial vehicles to the beneficiaries under a certain scheme. It is the case of the petitioner that the vehicles are given to the beneficiaries at the subsidized rate. The beneficiaries pay for a certain amount of the price of the vehicles and the remaining balance in the form of subsidy is to be paid by the State Government in the Agriculture Department.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the amount due to the petitioner as worked out by the petitioner which is annexed as Annexure-IV, page-20 of the writ petition.

4. Ms. G. Bora, learned counsel for the respondents submits that she may be given some time to obtain instructions in the matter.

5. Mr. N.A. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand submits that if certain amount has already been disbursed to the petitioner, the respondents will be at liberty to deduct the same from the final amount to be paid to the petitioner.

Page No.# 3/3

6. Be stated herein that a Full Bench judgment of this Court in Tamsher Ali and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1 has laid down certain steps and guidelines for verifying and releasing the admitted liability of the State Government. Therefore, this Court does not find any impediment in disposing of this writ petition in terms of Tamsher Ali (supra).

7. In view of the above, the respondent authorities within a period of 4 (Four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order shall verify the claim made by the petitioner regarding the outstanding liability and if the same is found to be correct and genuine, the same shall be processed in accordance with law in terms of the decision rendered by this Court in Tamsher Ali (supra).

8. With the above observations and directions this writ petition stands disposed of.

9. It is needless to mention herein that if there is any amount paid to the petitioner in the meantime, the respondents are at liberty to deduct the same.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter